Predicting Distant Melanoma Metastasis at Diagnosis Using Machine Learning
Kim, J. J. H.; Lee, J. W. Y.; Yuan, H.; Han, C.; Zandigohar, M.; Haber, R.; Tsoukas, M.; Avanaki, K.
Show abstract
Distant melanoma metastasis at the time of diagnosis is uncommon, but has major implications for patient prognosis and treatment selection. However, few tools can reliably predict the risk of distant metastasis at initial presentation. Here, we developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict distant melanoma metastasis using routinely captured clinicopathologic and demographic variables across all histologic subtypes. Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2010-2022, we identified adults aged 20 to 90 years with melanoma as the first and only primary malignancy (n=51,285). Explainable Boosting Machine achieved a strong balance of discrimination and precision (AUROC = 0.947, AUPRC = 0.610, Precision = 0.793, Brier = 0.015). At 90% sensitivity, specificity was 0.843 with consistent performance across cross-validation folds. Clinicopathologic variables, including T stage, Breslow thickness, ulceration, and mitotic activity, contributed the largest share of predictive signal across descriptive, regression-based, and SHAP analyses, with smaller contributions from demographic factors. Decision curve analysis supported clinical utility, showing a net reduction of 88.3 per 100 patients and a standardized net benefit of 0.541. This model could be used to identify patients at sufficiently elevated risk to justify staging PET/CT despite otherwise localized clinical presentation. Cost-consequence analysis further showed that imaging true- and false-positive patients at 85% to 95% sensitivity threshold nearly doubled downstream imaging cost. We deployed the final model as an online calculator to support exploration of individualized risk estimates (https://melanoma-calculator.streamlit.app/).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte patterns and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic cutaneous melanoma 94%
- Development of an artificial intelligence-generated, explainable treatment recommendation system for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to support multidisciplinary cancer conferences 91%
- Repurposing cardiovascular disease prediction models for cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting skin cancer risk from facial images with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based approach: a proof-of-concept study 92%
- Prevalence of COVID-19-related risk factors and risk of severe influenza outcomes in cancer survivors: a matched cohort study using linked English electronic health records data 87%
- The Impact of Early or Late Lockdowns on the Spread of COVID-19 in US Counties 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning-based tumor microenvironment segmentation is predictive of tumor mutations and patient survival in non-small-cell lung cancer 92%
- Machine learning predicts rapid relapse of triple negative breast cancer 91%
- Validation of Genomic and Transcriptomic Models of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in a Real-World Pan-Cancer Cohort 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumour gene expression signature in primary melanoma predicts long-term outcomes: A prospective multicentre study 94%
- The Impact of Digital Histopathology Batch Effect on Deep Learning Model Accuracy and Bias 93%
- Integrated radiogenomics models predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.