Experiences of families using an early example of neighbourhood multidisciplinary care for children and young people: A qualitative exploration using the theoretical framework of acceptability
Litchfield, I.; Dutton, F.; Harper, L.; Kaur, S.; Luxmoore, C.; Rahman, L.; Wolhuter, C.; Bird, C.
Show abstract
Background In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service is attempting to address the ongoing challenges to heath equity in underserved children and young people (CYP) by creating Neighbourhood Multi-Disciplinary Teams (NMDTs) that combine health services, social care providers, local authorities, voluntary, community and faith and social enterprise is needed. Despite this significant shift in the delivery of care, there is a lack of suitably robust evidence of family experience to inform their development. This work contributes to this need using the experience and perspectives of families using the experience and perspectives of families using an early example of an NMDT for CYP the Sparkbrook Children's Zone in Birmingham, United Kingdom. Methods The study used data collected from two focus groups conducted with parents whose children had been treated by the Sparkbrook Children's Zone. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis to populate Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results In summary and by framework domain, we found that that individuals became aware of the SCZ through a range of sources, understanding that it was multidisciplinary if sometimes unsure of precisely the organisations involved (Intervention coherence) Parents described the benefits to access of a locally situated collocated service (Burden) the personalised relationship with providers (Cultural sensitivity0 extended conultation time, and support for the family's complex clinical needs (Perceived effectiveness) Conclusions Parents appeared to prefer the SCZ over usual primary care but more work is needed with larger sample sizes to ensure that the structure of NMDTs are understood and optimised.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 96%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 95%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 94%
- A community developed conceptual model for reducing long-term health problems in children with intellectual disability in India 94%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 96%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 95%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 96%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 95%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.