Rethinking anomia across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum: marker of language dysfunction or global cognitive decline?
Henderson, S. K.; Russell-Meill, M.; Shivers, E.; Sivakumar, D.; Kiran, S.
Show abstract
Background: Anomia is common in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), although its clinical prominence varies by subtype, with the most marked impairment typically observed in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). It remains unclear whether naming impairment reflects language-specific impairment or broader cognitive severity, and how it relates to other cognitive domains across FTD syndromes. Methods: Fifteen healthy controls and twenty-two individuals across the FTD spectrum, including variant-specified and unclassifiable (NOS) presentations, completed two confrontation naming tasks (Boston Naming Test and Multilingual Naming Test) and a global cognitive screening measure (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). Patient participants additionally completed a standardized language battery (Western Aphasia Battery Revised) and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment (Uniform Data Set). Naming performance was compared between groups and associations with language severity, global cognition, and domain-specific cognitive functions were examined using regression analyses. Results: Naming was impaired in patients relative to healthy controls but did not differ between patient groups. Naming was strongly associated with language severity, but not global cognition. A significant group-by-MoCA interaction indicated that MoCA was positively associated with naming only in the unclassifiable group. In addition, naming was associated with episodic memory across both verbal and non-verbal domains. Conclusions: Naming in FTD primarily reflects language severity rather than global cognitive impairment. A robust association between naming and episodic memory suggests potential contributions from semantic cognition, shared frontally mediated retrieval processes, or parallel cognitive decline. These findings support the use of naming as a marker of language dysfunction while highlighting its relevance to broader cognitive systems in FTD.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia 98%
- Verbal fluency tests assess global cognitive status but have limited diagnostic differentiation: Evidence from a large-scale examination of six neurodegenerative diseases 97%
- Social-semantic knowledge in frontotemporal dementia and after anterior temporal lobe resection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lexical and acoustic speech features relating to Alzheimer’s disease pathology 96%
- Automated detection of speech timing alterations in autopsy-confirmed non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia 96%
- Primary progressive aphasia in Italian and English: a cross-linguistic cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 95%
- Extensive memory testing improves prediction of progression to MCI in late middle age 94%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.