Back

Integrated Early Childhood Development Centres in Market and Cross-Border Settings: a Mixed-Methods Evaluation in Rwanda

Matsiko, E.; Nzeyimana, P.; Burungi, A.; Desie, S.

2026-05-19 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353227 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Access to quality early childhood development (ECD) services remains limited for families working in economic settings in many low-and middle-income countries. This study examined the associations between participation in integrated ECD centres of integrated ECD centres located in market and cross-border communities in Rwanda and childcare access, child nutrition, caregiving practices, and developmental outcomes. Methods A repeated cross-sectional pre-post evaluation without a comparison group was conducted between 2023 and 2025 across eight markets and cross-border ECD centres in Rwanda. Quantitative data were analyzed with logistic regression models adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. University of Rwanda College of Medicine and Health Sciences Institution review board approved the study (No.366/CMHS IRB/2023). Results The proportion of children aged 6-23 months who achieved minimum meal frequency increased from 26.6% to 57% (AOR=2.35; 95% CI: 1.01-5.49), and those meeting minimum acceptable diet increased from 15.4% to 51.4% (AOR=4.51; 95% CI: 1.77-11.45). Stunting declined from 32.6% to 15.7% (AOR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.32-0.63) and underweight from 9.3% to 4.3% (AOR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.97). The proportion of children aged 24-59 months who were developmentally on track increased from 77.9% to 93.8% (AOR=3.85; 95% CI: 2.23-6.65). Households reported higher income at endline, and the centres generated strong demand for childcare services. However, reports of scolding and physical punishment increased between surveys. Conclusions Integrated ECD centres in market and cross-border settings were associated with improved child feeding practices, nutritional status, and developmental outcomes among children from vulnerable working families in Rwanda. Place-based childcare models may represent a promising strategy for expanding access to integrated ECD services while supporting womens economic participation in economic settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
10
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%