Back

The Temporal Investigation of Multimodal Elements (TIME) Study: Protocol for an observational, longitudinal study to characterize the dynamic structure of molecular and digital data in healthy older adults

Yurkovich, J. T.; Glass, E.; Levine, N.; Lee, S.; Ehlen, K.; Hernandez, E.; Gharti, P.; Fernando, A.; Witherington, D.; Pflieger, L.; Erram, J.; Rappaport, N.; Le, A.; Newman, J. C.; Stubbs, B.

2026-05-19 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353203 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Biological systems exhibit dynamic patterns over multiple temporal scales -from minutes to months- that are poorly captured by conventional cross-sectional or low-frequency longitudinal studies. These patterns, including circadian and ultradian rhythms, may be critical determinants of health, resilience, and disease risk in aging. Existing longitudinal studies in older adults lack high-frequency, multimodal measurements that integrate molecular, physiological, and digital health data streams. Objectives: The TIME Study aims to: (i) Characterize temporal patterns in molecular, physiological, and digital health measures in healthy older adults; (ii) determine how these patterns vary across biological domains and relate to each other; and (iii) assess how physiological systems respond to defined perturbations (oral glucose tolerance and maximal exercise). Methods: TIME is a single-site, observational, longitudinal study enrolling up to 150 adults aged [≥] 55 years. Over an 11-week main phase, participants complete seven weekly low-frequency visits, two perturbation challenge visits, and two, two-day high-frequency sampling epochs. Biospecimens, clinical measures, cognitive and physical performance tests, and continuous digital health data are collected. Follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months. Expected Impact: By integrating multimodal, temporally resolved data, TIME will provide a foundational dataset for understanding the role of biological rhythms in aging and inform future precision health strategies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
5
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Psychophysiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
24
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%