Back

The Temporal Investigation of Multimodal Elements (TIME) Study: Protocol for an observational, longitudinal study to characterize the dynamic structure of molecular and digital data in healthy older adults

Yurkovich, J. T.; Glass, E.; Levine, N.; Lee, S.; Ehlen, K.; Hernandez, E.; Gharti, P.; Fernando, A.; Witherington, D.; Pflieger, L.; Erram, J.; Rappaport, N.; Le, A.; Newman, J. C.; Stubbs, B.

2026-05-19 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353203 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Biological systems exhibit dynamic patterns over multiple temporal scales -from minutes to months- that are poorly captured by conventional cross-sectional or low-frequency longitudinal studies. These patterns, including circadian and ultradian rhythms, may be critical determinants of health, resilience, and disease risk in aging. Existing longitudinal studies in older adults lack high-frequency, multimodal measurements that integrate molecular, physiological, and digital health data streams. Objectives: The TIME Study aims to: (i) Characterize temporal patterns in molecular, physiological, and digital health measures in healthy older adults; (ii) determine how these patterns vary across biological domains and relate to each other; and (iii) assess how physiological systems respond to defined perturbations (oral glucose tolerance and maximal exercise). Methods: TIME is a single-site, observational, longitudinal study enrolling up to 150 adults aged [≥] 55 years. Over an 11-week main phase, participants complete seven weekly low-frequency visits, two perturbation challenge visits, and two, two-day high-frequency sampling epochs. Biospecimens, clinical measures, cognitive and physical performance tests, and continuous digital health data are collected. Follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months. Expected Impact: By integrating multimodal, temporally resolved data, TIME will provide a foundational dataset for understanding the role of biological rhythms in aging and inform future precision health strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.3%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.0%
7
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
13
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Sleep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%