Back

Automatic segmentation of choroid plexus using deep learning across neurodegenerative diagnoses in the multi-site COMPASS-ND Study

Singh, M.; Dabo, F.; Trigiani, L. J.; Araujo, D.; Narayanan, S.; Badhwar, A.

2026-05-18 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353194 medRxiv
Show abstract

The choroid plexus (ChP) plays a central role in cerebrospinal fluid production, immune signaling, and metabolic clearance, and has emerged as a potential imaging biomarker of neurodegeneration. However, accurate and scalable quantification of ChP volume remains challenging due to its complex morphology and low contrast on conventional MRI. The Automatic Segmentation of Choroid Plexus (ASCHOPLEX), a deep learning framework originally trained on healthy controls and multiple sclerosis cohorts, has not been systematically evaluated in neurodegenerative populations. Using T1-weighted MRI from the multi-center COMPASS-ND study, we assessed standard ASCHOPLEX performance in cognitively unimpaired (CU), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Parkinson's disease (PD) participants (N = 30), followed by fine-tuning using expert manual segmentations (N = 60). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using Dice, Jaccard, precision, and recall. The fine-tuned model was then applied to a larger cohort (N = 277) to derive normalized ChP volumes, which were compared across diagnostic groups using linear regression models. Fine-tuning significantly improved segmentation accuracy across all metrics (Dice: 0.45 to 0.84; Jaccard: 0.32 to 0.73; all p < 0.0001), enabling robust ChP delineation across sites and conditions. In the full cohort, normalized ChP volume was significantly higher in AD compared with CU and PD (p < 0.0001), while PD did not differ from CU (p = 0.31). These findings demonstrate that dataset-specific adaptation is essential for deploying deep learning segmentation models in heterogeneous neuroimaging cohorts. The refined ASCHOPLEX framework enables scalable ChP quantification and supports its use as a structural imaging marker in neurodegenerative disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.4%
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%