Back

Derivation and validation of clinical prediction models for viral etiologies of acute diarrhea in North American children presenting for emergency care

Fonseca-Romero, P.; Smith, T.; Ahmed, S. M.; Jones, A.; Alekhina, N.; Brintz, B. J.; Dien Bard, J.; Chapin, K. C.; Cohen, D. M.; Festekjian, A.; Jackson, J. T.; Kanwar, N.; Larsen, C. D.; Leber, A. L.; Selvarangan, R.; Freedman, S.; Pavia, A. T.; Leung, D. T.

2026-05-18 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353143 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Diarrheal illness in children leads to 3.5 million care visits and 200,000 hospitalizations annually in the US. Viruses are responsible for most pediatric diarrheal cases, yet limited guidance on distinguishing viral from bacterial etiologies complicates clinical decision-making, especially regarding empiric antibiotic use. Methods: We used clinical and qualitative molecular etiologic data from the Implementation of Molecular Diagnostics for Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis (IMPACT) study to develop prediction models for viral etiology of diarrhea. We used conditional random forests to identify informative clinical and environmental predictors and evaluated model performance using logistic regression and random forests within a 5-fold cross-validation framework. We conducted external validation using the Alberta Provincial Pediatric Enteric Infection Team (APPETITE) dataset. Results: Variables predictive of viral etiology included younger age, non-bloody diarrhea, winter season, and presence of vomiting. External validation showed that an AUC of 0.82 can be achieved with a parsimonious 5-variable model, yielding a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.55 Conclusion: Our results suggest that in North American healthcare settings, clinical prediction models can inform decision-making by identifying children with a high probability of viral diarrhea, improving diagnostic clarity, and reducing unnecessary testing and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.8%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
5
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
25
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
28
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%