Back

Derivation and validation of clinical prediction models for viral etiologies of acute diarrhea in North American children presenting for emergency care

Fonseca-Romero, P.; Smith, T.; Ahmed, S. M.; Jones, A.; Alekhina, N.; Brintz, B. J.; Dien Bard, J.; Chapin, K. C.; Cohen, D. M.; Festekjian, A.; Jackson, J. T.; Kanwar, N.; Larsen, C. D.; Leber, A. L.; Selvarangan, R.; Freedman, S.; Pavia, A. T.; Leung, D. T.

2026-05-18 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353143 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Diarrheal illness in children leads to 3.5 million care visits and 200,000 hospitalizations annually in the US. Viruses are responsible for most pediatric diarrheal cases, yet limited guidance on distinguishing viral from bacterial etiologies complicates clinical decision-making, especially regarding empiric antibiotic use. Methods: We used clinical and qualitative molecular etiologic data from the Implementation of Molecular Diagnostics for Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis (IMPACT) study to develop prediction models for viral etiology of diarrhea. We used conditional random forests to identify informative clinical and environmental predictors and evaluated model performance using logistic regression and random forests within a 5-fold cross-validation framework. We conducted external validation using the Alberta Provincial Pediatric Enteric Infection Team (APPETITE) dataset. Results: Variables predictive of viral etiology included younger age, non-bloody diarrhea, winter season, and presence of vomiting. External validation showed that an AUC of 0.82 can be achieved with a parsimonious 5-variable model, yielding a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.55 Conclusion: Our results suggest that in North American healthcare settings, clinical prediction models can inform decision-making by identifying children with a high probability of viral diarrhea, improving diagnostic clarity, and reducing unnecessary testing and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
18
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
21
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
22
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%