Back

Genomic epidemiology as a tool for understanding drivers of hepatitis A community outbreaks in Massachusetts and New Hampshire

Krasilnikova, L. A.; Bouton, L.; Brock-Fisher, T. M.; Decker, E.; Godec, M.; Thompson, Z.; Dart, E.; Gao, F.; Gladden-Young, A.; Messer, K. S.; Norville, J.; Specht, I.; Osinski, A.; Li, J.; Lones, C.; DeRuff, K. C.; Siddle, K. J.; Church, D.; Benton, C.; Hansen, K.; Bowen, H.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Epie, N.; Brown, C. M.; Madoff, L. C.; MacInnis, B. L.; Gallagher, G. R.; Smole, S.; Bean, C.; Talbot, E. A.; Burns, M.; Doucette, M.; Fortes, E.; Park, D. J.; Sabeti, P. C.; Wohl, S.

2026-05-19 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.14.26352933 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the existence of an effective vaccine, the United States continues to experience outbreaks of hepatitis A, including in Massachusetts (MA) and New Hampshire (NH) in 2018 and again in MA in 2023. To clarify the relationship between these outbreaks and better understand their drivers, we generated hepatitis A virus whole genome sequences from reported cases and analyzed them using open-source genotyping tools developed and released as part of this study. We found that the 2018 and 2023 outbreaks were caused by distinct viral strains, despite affecting individuals with similar demographic characteristics and reported risk factors. Detailed analysis of genomic and epidemiologic data further resolved transmission patterns within and across outbreaks, showing that experiencing homelessness and prior use of drugs were associated with increased transmission while also revealing transmission between individuals with and without these risk factors, as well as spread across state borders. Together, these findings demonstrate the value of broadly accessible genomic tools for understanding hepatitis A outbreaks and illustrate how whole genome analysis can complement epidemiological investigation by resolving transmission patterns and outbreak drivers that can inform public health interventions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.4%
3
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
4
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
5
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
14
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.7%