Back

Mutation E300 recommended by protein language models gives ChrimsonR amplified photocurrent response

Ehrlich, S. M.; Vandeloo, A. D.; Magondu, B.; Chien, A.; Sinha, S.; Boyden, E. S.; Forest, C. R.

2026-05-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.13.725064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central challenge in opsin engineering is identifying mutations that reliably improve desired functional properties, a task made difficult by the enormous mutation space and limited throughput of electrophysiological screening. Improving opsin properties such as photocurrent amplitude and light sensitivity have the potential to broaden the use of opsins to low-light and deep-tissue applications. With this goal, we applied zero-shot protein language models (ESM-1b/1v) to recommend ChrimsonR mutations and experimentally validated all 17 of these variants using whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology (n=6 cells per mutation). Despite many mutations reducing function, protein language models identified both known functional residues and unconventional substitutions that produced large functional gains and synergized with K176R to improve kinetics. Two mutations, E300G and E300P, increased sustained photocurrents from 66 pA (control) to 305 pA and 255 pA at 635 nm, reduced EC50 at 575 nm from 0.19 mW to 0.07 mW, and altered kinetics ({tau}off increased from 0.06 s up to 0.40 s). Our results suggest that protein language models, even without task-specific training, can be used alongside electrophysiological measurements as a strategy for screening opsins for enhanced photocurrent.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
17.9%
2
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
9
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
23
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%