Back

From Peaks to Power: Systematic Evaluation of Chromatographic Sampling Reveals Determinants of Quantification and Biological Discovery in DIA Proteomics

Cantrell, L. S.; Just, S.; Stukalov, A.; Farokhzad, O. C.; Batzoglou, S.

2026-05-16 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.13.724964 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern DIA proteomics increasingly emphasizes throughput and depth for large-cohort studies, but methods are often optimized using proxy metrics that can mask losses in quantifiable signal and statistical power. Here, we evaluate how datapoints per peak and other chromatographic features jointly contribute to quantification and downstream biological discovery. Using a matrix-matched calibration curve dataset, we checked how the number of datapoints per peak (DPPP) affects the limits of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ). Reduced DPPP minimally affected LOD but substantially degraded LOQ. Feature modeling and nonparametric association analyses identified precursor peak area as the strongest feature-level predictor of LOQ, whereas DPPP showed weaker and context-dependent effects. Simulations of chromatographic peak integration recapitulated these trends, showing that increased sampling primarily improves integration precision, while quantitative accuracy is strongly governed by peak height and peak shape. Finally, when comparing 20 cancer vs 20 control plasma samples processed with Seer Proteograph, the decrease in DPPP led to a loss of statistical significance for proteins with low-abundance precursors. These findings argue that DIA optimization should prioritize LOQ and statistical power metrics - not identifications alone - by balancing sampling density with chromatographic peak height and quality to maximize useful biological signal.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
19.2%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
6
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
7
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
14
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
22
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%