Beyond connectivity: dispersal mortality and Allee effects prevent bobcat recolonisation despite habitat availability

Wildlife crossing infrastructure is promoted to restore connectivity for fragmented populations, but its effectiveness at enabling natural recolonisation remains untested. We tested this using a spatially explicit agent-based model parameterised with GPS telemetry data from bobcats (Lynx rufus) in New Jersey, USA. By integrating movement behaviour, stochastic demography, habitat suitability, and traffic-dependent mortality risk, we simulated 50-year recolonisation dynamics across a highly urbanised landscape. Despite extensive unoccupied suitable habitat, natural recolonisation completely failed across all scenarios, with vehicle-induced mortality during dispersal acting as the primary limiting factor and turning the matrix into a demographic sink. Even an idealised mitigation scenario in which mortality at high-mortality crossings was reduced to zero failed to produce a self-sustaining population. Although dispersal increased, individuals at the recolonisation front remained too sparse to overcome the mate-finding Allee effect. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the recolonisation-failure result is robust to {+/-}50% variation in per-crossing mortality and {+/-}25% variation in disperser survival. Restoring structural connectivity is not, in itself, a sufficient intervention for recovering low-density carnivore populations facing a high-mortality matrix. Instead disperser survival and local density at the recolonisation front are the rate-limiting determinants. In such systems translocation rather than crossing-structure investment is more likely to result in recolonisation success.