Back

Identifying Treatment Related Signatures In Glioblastoma Using KaleidoCell

Radig, J.; Welz, C.; Jerome, M. S.; Ostheimer, P. S.; Fellenz, S.; Radlwimmer, B.; Herrmann, C.

2026-05-16 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.13.724848 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how transcriptional heterogeneity is organized across tumors, patients, and treatment conditions remains a central challenge in cancer biology. Here, we present kaleidoCell, a GPU-accelerated Python framework for consensus non-negative matrix factorization that identifies reproducible meta-programs across independent samples. When benchmarked against its principal counterpart, the geneNMF R package, kaleidoCell achieves a twofold speed improvement on large datasets. In addition, it includes an integrated analysis module that generates a comprehensive HTML report containing key results and visualizations--including marker genes corresponding to the meta-programs, gene set enrichment analysis, UMAP projections and violin plots--without requiring additional user code. Using glioblastoma as a case study, we applied kaleidoCell to two published datasets. In a panobinostat-treated cohort, kaleidoCell resolves the cellular landscape of the tumor microenvironment and delineates how HDAC inhibition reshapes malignant cell states at single-cell resolution. We extend prior descriptions of the metallothionein-associated stress program in treatment response and identify co induction of IER3 as a candidate component of the associated survival signalling. In addition, we uncover novel transcriptional signatures associated with HDAC inhibition. Beyond confirming suppression of a neural progenitor cell-/oligodendrocyte progenitor cell-like program which is consistent with prior reports, kaleidoCell identifies loss of an astrocyte-like identity program as a previously unrecognized candidate mechanism of panobinostat action in glioblastoma. Together, these results establish kaleidoCell as a fast, user-friendly framework that enables robust discovery of biologically meaningful transcriptional programs in large, heterogeneous single-cell datasets.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.