Back

A spectral partial information decomposition framework for quantifying information about cognitive variables in oscillatory brain networks

Lima Cordeiro, V.; Marinazzo, D.; Brovelli, A.

2026-05-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.13.724846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural oscillations are thought to play a central role in encoding and transmitting cognitive information across large-scale brain networks, yet the relative contributions of phase synchrony and amplitude co-modulations to distributed coding remain unclear. A key obstacle is the absence of tools that can simultaneously quantify task-relevant information in the frequency domain and disentangle its phase and amplitude components across pairwise and higher-order interactions. Here, we introduce a spectral partial information decomposition framework (named NeOPID) for quantifying information about cognitive variables in power and phase contributions, and to quantify redundant and synergistic information in brain relations, from pairwise to higher-order interactions. We validated the approach on Kuramoto and Stuart-Landau oscillator networks, including a whole-brain model constrained by macaque anatomical connectivity. NeOPID accurately recovers ground-truth encoding schemes and reveals that phase relations and amplitude co-modulations act as complementary coding channels with both redundant and synergistic components. NeOPID further extends this decomposition to higher-order functional interactions enabling the characterization of how cognitive information is collectively distributed across multiple oscillatory edges via redundant and synergistic encoding. To illustrate biological applicability, we applied NeOPID to local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the macaque fronto-parietal network during a working memory task. In this dataset, NeOPID identified beta-band amplitude co-modulations as the primary carrier of stimulus information, and revealed that higher-order phase interactions exhibit both redundant and synergistic structure during the memory delay. These results establish NeOPID as a principled tool for dissecting the informational architecture about cognitive processes of oscillatory brain networks.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
10
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
14
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
20
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%