Back

Resting-state heartbeat-evoked potentials are associated with Kalman-derived cardiac prediction errors

Hirao, T.; Terada, K.; Miyamae, M.; Yamada, M.

2026-05-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.13.724845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) reflects the cortical processing of cardiac afferent signals. However, it remains unclear whether trial-level interoceptive prediction errors can be quantified directly from spontaneous resting cardiac fluctuations and whether these model-derived errors are associated with HEP amplitude. Here, we applied a Kalman filter, implemented as a sequential Bayesian estimation procedure, to resting-state EEG and ECG recordings from 21 healthy adults to estimate trial-by-trial signed prediction errors in RR-intervals. Positive prediction errors reflected unexpected cardiac deceleration, whereas negative prediction errors reflected unexpected cardiac acceleration. Cluster-based permutation tests showed that unexpected cardiac acceleration was associated with greater fronto-centro-parietal HEP amplitude than unexpected deceleration in an early post-R-peak window, spanning FC1, CP1, Pz, CP2, Cz, C4 and FC2 from 215 to 250 ms. A Bayesian linear mixed-effects model further indicated a credible negative association between signed prediction error and HEP amplitude after controlling for respiratory phase and preceding RR interval. In a secondary connectivity analysis, unexpected acceleration was associated with stronger Cz-to-frontal beta-band phase synchrony during a later post-R-peak window from 250 to 500 ms. Exploratory individual-difference analyses suggested that neuroticism was negatively correlated with late frontal HEP amplitude during unexpected acceleration, but not during unexpected deceleration or when trials were pooled across conditions. These findings demonstrate that spontaneous cardiac fluctuations can be used to derive trial-level computational estimates of interoceptive prediction error and that these estimates are reflected in early HEP amplitude. They further suggest that the cortical processing of unexpected cardiac acceleration may be related to individual differences in affective personality traits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.4%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
5
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
18
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%