Back

A historical specimen of False Lingzhi (Ganoderma lucidum) resolves a 245-year-old confusion within an important medicinal mushroom group

Varga, T.; Parker, S. R.; Agorini, A.; Dombrowski, A.; Hadfield, L.; Ainsworth, A. M.; Hawksworth, D. L.; Ghobad-Nejhad, M.; Papp, V.

2026-05-14 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.13.724775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIPlants and fungi are major sources of natural products beneficial to society, making the study of distinct species essential for discovering new drugs and bioactive compounds. The medicinal mushroom "Lingzhi" or "Reishi" (Ganoderma lingzhi) is widely used in traditional medicine and extensively studied for its bioactive triterpenoids, yet it is commonly identified as Ganoderma lucidum, the type species of the genus, which lacks a type specimen. C_LIO_LIWe sequenced a G. lucidum specimen preserved in the Kew fungarium, which agreed with the original description and was collected from wood of Corylus avellana in southern England. Using this reference specimen, we compiled genomic and ITS barcoding datasets to explore the genetic and geographic variation within this species. C_LIO_LIWe showed that G. lingzhi and G. lucidum diverged more than 12 million years ago and that all seven "G. lucidum" genomes deposited in public databases belong to other species. More than 1000 barcoding sequences showed that the widely used homology-based ITS barcoding is not working in this group, which can be mitigated by a phylogenetic placement approach. The 149 sequences assigned to G. lucidum with high confidence showed a Eurasian distribution and introductions to North and South America and Africa. C_LIO_LIOur study underscores the importance of accurate species identification and provides guidance for a group of pharmaceutical and socially significant species. To further support future studies and the wider public in differentiating between G. lingzhi and G. lucidum, we propose using "False Lingzhi" as the English name for G. lucidum. C_LI Societal Impact StatementTraditional Chinese Medicine has expanded far beyond Asia, with growing markets in North America and Europe for supplements and functional foods. Lingzhi or Reishi (Ganoderma lingzhi), a well-known medicinal mushroom, is valued for its anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties. However, it is often misidentified with species that may not provide the same health benefits. This confusion poses risks to consumer safety, product regulation, and research. Here, we establish a reference using morphological and molecular tools for the most commonly misidentified species (Ganoderma lucidum) and propose the name "False Lingzhi" to distinguish it, supporting accurate identification, safer product development, and reliable research.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.1%
5
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
7
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
10
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
13
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
20
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Biochimie
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
30
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%