Back

Digital Atlases to Unlock the Potential of Brain Biorepository Tissues for Interdisciplinary Research

Webster, J. M.; Shojaie, A.; Shen, Y. A.; Le, T.; Ragaglia, E.; Bogdani, M.; Kirkland, A.; Mac Donald, C.; Latimer, C. S.; Keene, C. D.; Grabowski, T. J.

2026-05-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.13.724753 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human brain tissue preserved in biorepositories is foundational for the structural, cellular, and biomolecular research necessary for a mechanistic understanding of neurological diseases. Realizing the research potential of these valuable resources requires well-characterized research-relevant tissue that can be efficiently identified by investigators and incorporated into the conceptual and computational frameworks of interdisciplinary research. Several large-scale efforts to improve research reliability and reproducibility have sought to characterize and annotate the processes by which these samples are collected, yet limited progress has been made on standardizing spatial information for these samples. Biorepositories systematically collect brain tissue according to a brain sampling protocol (BSP) that differs between institutions, yet explicit spatial information regarding the samples may not be documented in standard operating procedures (SOPs). The amount of anatomical location details available to investigators are inconsistent across biorepositories and typically lack sufficient anatomical precision to ensure correspondence with samples from other biorepositories or research relevant brain regions specified by neuroimaging, functional, or disease-susceptibility criteria. Here, we introduce a pipeline for developing a Spatial Atlas for Mapping Protocol Locations of Ex vivo Samples (SAMPLES), which uses a neuroimaging framework to create a 3D representation of a BSP through a metrically precise digital instantiation of the procedures for brain extraction, segmentation, slicing, and sampling on a modern digital brain template. SAMPLES incorporates modern neuroinformatics conventions to create explicit 3D labels of BSP-defined samples that can be interactively visualized with freely available neuroimaging software. We illustrate the pipeline by developing an atlas for the protocol from the University of Washington BioRepository and Integrated Neuropathology laboratory (UW BRaIN SAMPLES). By providing an explicit, computable reference, SAMPLES atlases can support the efficient identification, referencing, and utilization of postmortem samples for interdisciplinary research. These capabilities enable biorepository workflows, data harmonization across biorepositories, and integration with antemortem neuroimaging.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.5%
3
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Journal of Open Source Software
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%