Back

Fungal Hyphae as Distributed Vapor Sinks

Lin, Y. J.; Feng, L.; Khan, A.; Park, K.-c.; Jung, S.

2026-05-14 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.13.724476 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hygroscopic surfaces act as local vapor sinks that reshape the condensation field around them, but whether distributed biological structures do the same has not been investigated. We have established that hyphae of fungal colonies functionally behave as vapor sinks, creating a dry region of width{delta} around themselves when placed on a cooled substrate. In addition, the radial distribution of droplet sizes steepens during condensation, and the rate at which droplets evaporate locally after chamber drying increases. In order to quantify this behavior, we employed a combination of time-resolved imaging and survival analysis to determine how long individual droplets persist on the surface surrounding the colony. These data were used to derive three quantitative measures of the vapor-sink effect. Each measure was found to be directly proportional to the vapor-sink strength of the substrate, as calibrated against NaCl-agar hydrogels of known water activity (LOOCV RMSE = 0.031 for recovered aw). These findings were consistent across three fungal genera (35 experiments), and all species fell along calibration lines defined by the hydrogel standards. This result is consistent with a diffusion-limited vapor-depletion framework. The measured genus-level{delta} ratios agreed to within 6% of predictions from structural absorbing capacity, and field measurements on Gymnosporangium-infected apple leaves were consistent with the same signatures under natural conditions. These results establish a non-contact method for inferring the material properties of thin hygroscopic biological surfaces from their condensation patterns.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
7
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
15
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
22
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%