Back

Dual targeting of CCR2+ monocytes and neutrophils enhances anti-tumor immunity

Fjaestad, K. Y.; Johansen, A. Z.; Linder, H.; Carretta, M.; Siersbaek, M.; Baker, K. J.; Thorseth, M.-L.; Hübbe, M. L.; Hald Andersen, M.; Grontved, L.; Madsen, D. H.

2026-05-15 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.13.723724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting immunosuppressive tumor-associated myeloid populations has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance anti-tumor immunity. The CCL2-CCR2 axis plays a central role in the recruitment of monocytes that differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), yet the therapeutic potential of CCR2 targeting remains limited. Using transgenic CCR2-DTR mice, we show that depletion of CCR2+ monocytes and TAMs reduced tumor growth across multiple models, accompanied by remodeling of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Residual CCR2-independent TAMs exhibited a pro-inflammatory and less immunosuppressive phenotype, and expressed the alternative recruitment receptor CCR3. Concomitantly, CCR2 depletion markedly enhanced anti-tumor immunity by increasing infiltration of activated CD8+ T cells. Splenocytes from tumor-bearing CCR2-DTR mice showed an increased IFN{gamma} response to a cancer-associated antigen. Furthermore, CCR2 depletion synergized with immune checkpoint blockade to enhance tumor control. Despite these effects, compensatory tumor infiltration of neutrophils following CCR2 targeting limited therapeutic benefit. These neutrophils exhibited a terminally differentiated, immunosuppressive phenotype and were associated with increased cancer cell-intrinsic expression of the neutrophil-recruiting chemokines Cxcl2 and Cxcl5. Importantly, combined depletion of CCR2+ cells and neutrophils overcame this resistance mechanism, resulting in reduced tumor growth, prolonged survival, and complete tumor clearance in 25% of the mice. Dual depletion of CCR2+ cells and neutrophils was also associated with a synergistic increase in circulating CD8+ T cells. These findings highlight the dynamic remodeling of the TME upon CCR2 depletion and suggest that combinatorial strategies addressing immunosuppressive neutrophil infiltration may improve the efficacy of CCR2 targeting therapies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
2
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.8%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
12
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
13
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
23
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
30
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%