Back

Biophysical and enzymatic comparison of Bacillus safensis and Bacillus subtilis malate dehydrogenase (MDH) enzymes

Zafiropoulo, H. R.; Thomas, J. E.; Cortez, N. R.; Apostol, K.; de Sa, A.; Khosravi, R.; Moore, L.; Berndsen, C. E.; Bibel, B.

2026-05-14 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.13.723581 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Species of Bacillus bacteria including Bacillus safensis and Bacillus subtilis are finding increasing uses in biotechnology and bioremediation, thanks in part to their metabolic robustness. Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) is at the heart of central metabolism and thus a better understanding of Bacillus MDH proteins could aid in the optimization of these applications. MDH of Bacillus spp. belong to the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-like class of MDHs, otherwise known as the MDH3 class. Despite wide prevalence in nature among prokaryotes and archaea, this typically homotetrameric class is understudied compared to the MDH1 and MDH2 classes found in eukaryotes. We therefore recombinantly expressed and purified MDH proteins from two societally relevant Bacillus spp.-B. safensis and B. subtilis-and characterized them biophysically (via Size Exclusion Chromatography-Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SEC-SAXS) and Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF)) and enzymatically (via spectroscopic activity assays). As expected based on their high sequence identity, the two MDH orthologs had similar properties in most regards, including a tetrameric structure and high susceptibility to substrate inhibition. However, we uncovered differences in conditional thermal stability, in addition to subtle differences in enzymatic activity that offer insight into the workings of LDH-like MDH. Summary statementMalate dehydrogenase (MDH) is a fundamental metabolic enzyme, from microbes to mammals, yet comparably little is known about microbial MDH, especially MDH of the tetrameric MDH3 class. We compare the biophysical and enzymatic properties of two such enzymes from the societally relevant bacterial species Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus safensis, offering useful insight with potential biotechnological implications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
2
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
7
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.5%
15
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Biochimie
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
27
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%