A qualitative study exploring opportunities for poverty alleviation interventions amongst people with severe mental health conditions in Eastern Cape, South Africa

Background People with severe mental health conditions (SMHC) and caregivers in South Africa experience high rates of poverty. The PRIZE feasibility trial found that recovery groups were broadly acceptable and feasible and potentially effective in reducing relapse. Addressing economic needs was identified as a means to increase impact. This study aimed to understand experiences of financial insecurity and acceptability of poverty alleviation interventions as an adjunct to psychosocial interventions amongst people with SMHC and caregivers. Methods We conducted two focus group discussions and 12 in-depth interviews in isiXhosa with a total of 14 people with SMHC and 13 caregivers who had participated in PRIZE in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Results We identified four major themes. Theme 1: Financial insecurity as a defining influence on life. We found that financial security was crucial to recovery, through bringing status and dignity. However, participants experienced substantial financial insecurity, which impacted on social and mental wellbeing. Financial insecurity was entrenched due to fractured and violent communities, cycles of debt and stigma amongst employers. Theme 2: Government disability grants are not a panacea. Difficulties accessing disability grants included problems attending assessments and rejection of applications. Whilst they were generally welcomed, receipt of disability grants sometimes caused problems such as increased stigma and family disagreements about how the money should be spent. Theme 3: Group savings offer conditional hope if carefully managed. Several caregivers had longstanding experiences of stokvels (community-based credit unions). However, some were fearful of group members absconding with funds. Participants emphasised that trust, safety and fairness are essential for successful group savings. Theme 4: Income-generating activities are desired but need capital and come with safety concerns. Many had ideas and motivation for small businesses but stressed the need for financial capital, skills training and financial literacy support. There were serious concerns that owning a business or gaining wealth could make one a target of crime. Conclusion Poverty alleviation interventions could positively impact on the wellbeing of people with SMHC and caregivers in South Africa as an adjunct to psychosocial interventions and psychiatric care. Approaches could include supporting access to social protection or existing savings groups, and nesting new savings groups or income generation initiatives into psychosocial interventions. Any model would need to incorporate robust mechanisms to ensure the safety of participants. All approaches would be enhanced by parallel social and public health interventions to build social capital and reduce violence in neighbourhoods.