Deep learning-based recognition model for surgical phases of minimally invasive hysterectomy: A multicentre retrospective study
Koike, R.; Takenaka, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Harada, Y.; Nakabayashi, M.; Hirose, Y.; Chikazawa, K.; Shimada, K.; Yoshiizumi, E.; Komatsu, H.; Tanabe, H.; Matsumoto, K.
Show abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a robust deep-learning model capable of fine-grained phase recognition in total hysterectomy, particularly the complex periuterine dissection phase. Design: Multicentre retrospective observational study. Setting: Japan. Sample: Surgical videos (n = 764) from 43 institutions. Methods: We developed a robust and generalisable deep-learning model for surgical phase recognition in total hysterectomy, applicable to laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures. Overall, 1,591,334 still images were annotated across nine surgical phases. A convolutional neural network (Xception architecture) was trained on 200 cases using four-fold cross-validation, with institutional separation between training and testing sets. Main outcome measures: Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Subgroup analysis and logistic regression evaluated the association between background clinical factors and recognition accuracy. Results: The model achieved an overall phase recognition accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74--0.80), with a precision of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72--0.78) and a recall of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74--0.78). Performance was consistent across laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures and across most surgical phases. Accuracy plateaued after training on 120 cases. No clinical factors significantly impacted performance. Trends toward lower accuracy were observed for cases with cervical myoma and pouch of Douglas adhesions. Conclusions: This model demonstrated high accuracy across diverse institutions and patient backgrounds. Its potential applications include surgical education, real-time intraoperative support, and training efficiency enhancement.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 93%
- Longitudinal ultrasonic dimensions and parametric solid models of the gravid uterus and cervix 92%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expert Surgeons and Deep Learning Models Can Predict the Outcome of Surgical Hemorrhage from One Minute of Video 95%
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 92%
- Widely accessible prognostication using medical history for fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age in nationwide insured women 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Scene Understanding: A Systematic Review and Reporting Quality Meta-Analysis 94%
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 92%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating clinical factors and parity-specific models with molecular biomarkers to better predict the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women 90%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.