Back

Deep learning-based recognition model for surgical phases of minimally invasive hysterectomy: A multicentre retrospective study

Koike, R.; Takenaka, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Harada, Y.; Nakabayashi, M.; Hirose, Y.; Chikazawa, K.; Shimada, K.; Yoshiizumi, E.; Komatsu, H.; Tanabe, H.; Matsumoto, K.

2026-05-17 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353100 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a robust deep-learning model capable of fine-grained phase recognition in total hysterectomy, particularly the complex periuterine dissection phase. Design: Multicentre retrospective observational study. Setting: Japan. Sample: Surgical videos (n = 764) from 43 institutions. Methods: We developed a robust and generalisable deep-learning model for surgical phase recognition in total hysterectomy, applicable to laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures. Overall, 1,591,334 still images were annotated across nine surgical phases. A convolutional neural network (Xception architecture) was trained on 200 cases using four-fold cross-validation, with institutional separation between training and testing sets. Main outcome measures: Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Subgroup analysis and logistic regression evaluated the association between background clinical factors and recognition accuracy. Results: The model achieved an overall phase recognition accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74--0.80), with a precision of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72--0.78) and a recall of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74--0.78). Performance was consistent across laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures and across most surgical phases. Accuracy plateaued after training on 120 cases. No clinical factors significantly impacted performance. Trends toward lower accuracy were observed for cases with cervical myoma and pouch of Douglas adhesions. Conclusions: This model demonstrated high accuracy across diverse institutions and patient backgrounds. Its potential applications include surgical education, real-time intraoperative support, and training efficiency enhancement.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.9%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
5
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
19
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
30
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%