Back

Longitudinal Changes in Left Atrial Stiffness Index Improve Risk Stratification in Patients with Hypertension

Kim, H. M.; Bak, M.; Park, J.; Choi, H.-M.; Yoon, Y. E.; Cho, G.-Y.; Hwang, I.-C.

2026-05-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353089 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Left atrial (LA) stiffness index is a non-invasive echocardiographic parameter reflecting left ventricular filling pressure; however, its prognostic significance in hypertension remains unclear. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of the longitudinal change in LA stiffness index in patients with hypertension. Methods: We analyzed 1,442 hypertensive patients from the STRATS-HHD registry who underwent echocardiography including LA and left ventricular (LV) strain at baseline and 6-18 months. Patients were categorized into four groups according to longitudinal changes in LA stiffness index: normal-normal, improved, aggravated, and persistently stiff. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and cardiovascular death, and secondary outcomes included HHF and incident atrial fibrillation. Results: Among 1,442 patients, 996 (69.1%) were classified as normal-normal, 173 (12.0%) as improved, 91 (6.3%) as aggravated, and 182 (12.6%) as persistently stiff. Over 5 years, aggravated (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.175, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.048-4.515, P=0.037) and persistently stiff (aHR 2.935, 95% CI 1.697-5.076, P<0.001) groups were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome, whereas the improved group showed a similar risk to the normal-normal group. Similar trends were observed for HHF and for incident atrial fibrillation. Adding LA stiffness index into a model including clinical factors and LV mass index improved risk prediction for composite outcomes. Conclusions: LA stiffness index was associated with clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients, with longitudinal changes providing additional prognostic information. Assessment of its trajectory may further refine risk stratification in patients with hypertension.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%