Back

Computational framework for the World Health Organization estimates of the global, regional and national burden of foodborne diseases 2026 edition

Devleesschauwer, B.; Vaes, L.; Fernandez, K.; Borghi, E.; Cao, B.; Fastl, C.; Jakobsen, L. S.; Kumapley, R.; Lake, R. J.; Majowicz, S. E.; Minato, Y.; Pires, S. M.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Nane, G. F.; Robertson, L.; Scallan Walter, E.; Torgerson, P. R.; Kretzschmar, M. E.; di Bari, C.

2026-05-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353030 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Foodborne diseases cause substantial global morbidity and mortality, yet remain largely unattended. To support countries to address this public health concern, the World Health Assembly Resolution 73.5 called for strengthening global food safety efforts and led to the development of the WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety 2022-2030, adopted at the 75th WHA (2022). To this end, the World Health Organization (WHO) reconvened the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) to advise and support the work to generate updated global, regional, and national estimates of the foodborne disease burden for the reference period 2000-2021. Methods We developed an incidence-based framework expanding coverage to 42 foodborne hazards. Standardized systematic reviews, Global Health Estimates and Global Burden of Disease envelopes, and United Nations population data informed the evidence base. Missing epidemiological data were imputed using Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression models. Disease models mapped acute and chronic health outcomes, applying updated disability weights, life tables, and probabilistic Monte Carlo calculations to estimate incidence, mortality, Years Lived with Disability, Years of Life Lost and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for all 194 WHO Member States. Transparency and analysis reproducibility were ensured through availed open-source R packages and standardized workflows. Results The computational framework provides annual, country-level estimates with improved internal consistency and an expanded hazard scope compared with the WHO 2015 edition. Advances include refined modelling, enhanced uncertainty propagation, and broader inclusion of microbial, parasitic, and chemical hazards. Persistent data gaps---especially in high-burden regions---were filled through extensive imputation. Conclusions The computational framework for the WHO 2026 edition delivers the most comprehensive and transparent assessment of the global burden of foodborne diseases to date. Despite remaining limitations, it enables routine monitoring, supports evaluation of global food safety efforts, and highlights priorities for strengthening national data systems.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
11
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
22
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
28
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
29
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
30
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%