Back

Computational framework for the World Health Organization estimates of the global, regional and national burden of foodborne diseases 2026 edition

Devleesschauwer, B.; Vaes, L.; Fernandez, K.; Borghi, E.; Cao, B.; Fastl, C.; Jakobsen, L. S.; Kumapley, R.; Lake, R. J.; Majowicz, S. E.; Minato, Y.; Pires, S. M.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Nane, G. F.; Robertson, L.; Scallan Walter, E.; Torgerson, P. R.; Kretzschmar, M. E.; di Bari, C.

2026-05-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353030 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Foodborne diseases cause substantial global morbidity and mortality, yet remain largely unattended. To support countries to address this public health concern, the World Health Assembly Resolution 73.5 called for strengthening global food safety efforts and led to the development of the WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety 2022-2030, adopted at the 75th WHA (2022). To this end, the World Health Organization (WHO) reconvened the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) to advise and support the work to generate updated global, regional, and national estimates of the foodborne disease burden for the reference period 2000-2021. Methods We developed an incidence-based framework expanding coverage to 42 foodborne hazards. Standardized systematic reviews, Global Health Estimates and Global Burden of Disease envelopes, and United Nations population data informed the evidence base. Missing epidemiological data were imputed using Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression models. Disease models mapped acute and chronic health outcomes, applying updated disability weights, life tables, and probabilistic Monte Carlo calculations to estimate incidence, mortality, Years Lived with Disability, Years of Life Lost and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for all 194 WHO Member States. Transparency and analysis reproducibility were ensured through availed open-source R packages and standardized workflows. Results The computational framework provides annual, country-level estimates with improved internal consistency and an expanded hazard scope compared with the WHO 2015 edition. Advances include refined modelling, enhanced uncertainty propagation, and broader inclusion of microbial, parasitic, and chemical hazards. Persistent data gaps---especially in high-burden regions---were filled through extensive imputation. Conclusions The computational framework for the WHO 2026 edition delivers the most comprehensive and transparent assessment of the global burden of foodborne diseases to date. Despite remaining limitations, it enables routine monitoring, supports evaluation of global food safety efforts, and highlights priorities for strengthening national data systems.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.7%
2
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
5
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
18
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
20
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
22
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
29
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%