Computational framework for the World Health Organization estimates of the global, regional and national burden of foodborne diseases 2026 edition
Devleesschauwer, B.; Vaes, L.; Fernandez, K.; Borghi, E.; Cao, B.; Fastl, C.; Jakobsen, L. S.; Kumapley, R.; Lake, R. J.; Majowicz, S. E.; Minato, Y.; Pires, S. M.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Nane, G. F.; Robertson, L.; Scallan Walter, E.; Torgerson, P. R.; Kretzschmar, M. E.; di Bari, C.
Show abstract
Background Foodborne diseases cause substantial global morbidity and mortality, yet remain largely unattended. To support countries to address this public health concern, the World Health Assembly Resolution 73.5 called for strengthening global food safety efforts and led to the development of the WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety 2022-2030, adopted at the 75th WHA (2022). To this end, the World Health Organization (WHO) reconvened the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) to advise and support the work to generate updated global, regional, and national estimates of the foodborne disease burden for the reference period 2000-2021. Methods We developed an incidence-based framework expanding coverage to 42 foodborne hazards. Standardized systematic reviews, Global Health Estimates and Global Burden of Disease envelopes, and United Nations population data informed the evidence base. Missing epidemiological data were imputed using Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression models. Disease models mapped acute and chronic health outcomes, applying updated disability weights, life tables, and probabilistic Monte Carlo calculations to estimate incidence, mortality, Years Lived with Disability, Years of Life Lost and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for all 194 WHO Member States. Transparency and analysis reproducibility were ensured through availed open-source R packages and standardized workflows. Results The computational framework provides annual, country-level estimates with improved internal consistency and an expanded hazard scope compared with the WHO 2015 edition. Advances include refined modelling, enhanced uncertainty propagation, and broader inclusion of microbial, parasitic, and chemical hazards. Persistent data gaps---especially in high-burden regions---were filled through extensive imputation. Conclusions The computational framework for the WHO 2026 edition delivers the most comprehensive and transparent assessment of the global burden of foodborne diseases to date. Despite remaining limitations, it enables routine monitoring, supports evaluation of global food safety efforts, and highlights priorities for strengthening national data systems.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 92%
- Assessing early detection ability through spatial arrangements in environmental surveillance for poliovirus: a simulation-based study 92%
- Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening Policy Coding Methodologies to Improve COVID-19 Disease Modeling and Policy Responses: A Proposed Coding Framework and Recommendations 92%
- A Flexible Framework for Local-Level Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number in Geographic Regions with Sparse Data 91%
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of livestock density on Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense : a causal inference-based approach 94%
- Modelling to infer the role of animals in gambiense human African trypanosomiasis transmission and elimination in DRC 93%
- Estimation of Lassa fever incidence rates in West Africa: development of a modeling framework to inform vaccine trial design 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the dynamics of COVID-19 burden and impact of interventions in Java, Indonesia 92%
- Projecting vaccine demand and impact for emerging zoonotic pathogens 92%
- When time-dependence in disease outcome risk is not captured by impact evaluation modeling studies: a measles vaccination case study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.