Back

Patient-specific "Physical Twin" artery-on-chip platform reveals complex flow-dependent VWF mechanobiology and guides personalized antithrombotic therapy

Zhao, Y. C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Richard Louis, N. E. L.; Yap, N. A.; Nasser, A.; Sun, A.; Chen, Y. C.; Dupuy, A.; Obeng, E. M.; Kavurma, M. M.; Butcher, K. S.; Xu, X.; You, J.; Passam, F. H.; Ang, T.; Ju, L. A.

2026-05-15 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.12.724721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ischemic stroke triggered by carotid atherosclerosis remains unpredictable because the thrombosis embolization is governed by patient-specific vascular geometry and hemodynamics that cannot be recapitulated in conventional models. Here, we engineered "Physical Twin" artery-on-chip platforms that reproduce individualized carotid anatomy with humanized subendothelial matrix composition and arterial endothelial phenotype under physiological flow patterns. We then established thrombotic microenvironments following laser-induced injury. Computational fluid dynamics-guided experiments across distinct patient geometries reveal that local shear dictates a mechanobiological hierarchy: high-shear bifurcations ([~]3,000 s-{superscript 1}) produce von Willebrand factor (VWF) A1-dependent thrombi suppressible by conformationally sensitive inhibitors, whereas low-shear stenoses generate fragile aggregates where VWF-integrin IIb{beta} coupling governs embolization overgrowth. Pulsatile flow suppresses thrombotic growth independent of mean shear. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal why conformationally sensitive nanobodies (caplacizumab) outperform shear-independent aptamers (ARC1172) in high-shear bifurcation flow zones. This Physical Twin platform provides a mechanistic blueprint for geometry-informed, personalized antithrombotic therapy selection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.4%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.1%
3
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.2%
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
6
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.8%
9
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.0%
12
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
15
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
17
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
19
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%