Back

Explainable prediction and simulation of complex system dynamics through networks of manifolds

Park, J.; Smith, C.; Tseng, S. Y.; Guidera, J.; Semenov, A. V.; Smirnov, S.; Frank, L. M.; Pao, G. M.

2026-05-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.12.724527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Complex systems such as brains and other interacting biological and physical processes are difficult to represent because they evolve across many variables, scales, and nonlinear interactions. To capture these multivariate, multiscale interactions we have developed Generative Manifold Networks (GMNs) a machine learning framework consisting of a network of linked dynamical systems. The network is discovered by an interaction function which can focus on causality, shared information, nonlinearity or other metric. Network nodes are low-dimensional data-driven state-space manifolds with generator functions accommodating multiscale dynamics. In contrast to many machine learning approaches GMNs have no latent or randomly initialized variables providing transparent explainability. GMNs generate short term dynamics of chaos on par with echo state networks while outperforming them in long term generation of chaos and neural dynamics, but with a markedly reduced number of dimensions and without sensitive dependence on reservoir parameters or random states. As a result of their holistic, multiscale representation GMNs can learn the complete dynamics of a complex system. We further show that GMNs are universal approximators. GMNs are demonstrated on chaotic dynamics, neural and behavioral recordings of the fruit fly and domestic rat with comparisons to echo state networks and crossformer - a time series transformer. SignificanceA major challenge in machine learning is to model complex systems accurately without losing interpretability. Many methods that succeed in prediction rely on latent variables obscuring mechanistic insight and complicating experimental testing. Generative manifold networks (GMN) construct a network of low-dimensional functional manifolds directly from observed variables with no latent or randomly initialized variables: the model remains transparent and experimentally testable. We prove that GMN are universal approximators showing that high representational power can be achieved without sacrificing explainability. GMN therefore provides a general framework for prediction and simulation in neuroscience and complex systems where unraveling the links between variables in an experimentally testable manner is as important as forecasting their behavior.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.8%
3
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.2%
5
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
8
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
19
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
25
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%