Back

Life without heterotrimeric kinesins: trypanosomatids use a combination of homodimeric kinesin-2 motors to drive intraflagellar transport

Alves, A. A.; Cleetus, A.; Fort, C.; Zahonova, K.; Abbuehl, D.; Girard-Blanc, C.; Blisnick, T.; BONNEFOY, S.; Cayet, N.; Wang, Z.; Sunter, J.; Yurchenko, V.; Wheeler, R. J.; Okten, Z. J.; BASTIN, P.

2026-05-13 cell biology
10.64898/2026.05.12.724483 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heterotrimeric kinesin 2 is the canonical motor protein for anterograde intraflagellar transport (IFT), driving movement of protein complexes towards the tip of cilia and flagella. Here, we show that all members of the Euglenozoa group lack genes for heterotrimeric kinesins and instead possess a variable number of genes for two homodimeric kinesins termed KIN2A and KIN2B. When expressed in vitro, both Trypanosoma brucei kinesins form homodimers and move processively along brain microtubules, KIN2A being faster than KIN2B. Studies in T. brucei and Leishmania mexicana show anterograde and retrograde IFT of both kinesins, with KIN2A travelling throughout the whole length of the flagellum, while KIN2B is concentrated at its base. In the proximal portion of the flagellum, most KIN2B molecules travel without IFT proteins, except for a few particles that are associated with IFT proteins and reach the tip. Surprisingly, the absence of KIN2A has mild effects on IFT and flagellum assembly, whereas KIN2B is essential for both. Investigation of trypanosome flagella deprived of KIN2B revealed that IFT proteins do not access these flagella but that KIN2A can still circulate. These results support a division-of-labour model where KIN2B is responsible for the import of IFT proteins while KIN2A is responsible for most of the anterograde transport.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.6%
10
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
11
Traffic
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
16
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Cellular Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%