Back

Sound Localization Is Biased By Simultaneous And Delayed By Preceding Visual Distractors

Rocchi, F.; Haukes, N. C.; van Opstal, A. J.; van Wanrooij, M. M.

2026-05-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.12.724474 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWVision can shape auditory perception, especially when visual cues occur at different times and locations than sounds. Simultaneous but spatially misaligned lights bias the perceived location of a sound--a phenomenon known as the ventriloquism effect. Temporally misaligned lights can also affect the latency of auditory responses. However, it remains unclear how multiple visual stimuli that differ from sounds in both space and time jointly influence localization behaviour. We investigated how visual distractors, spatially misaligned by 10{degrees}, presented before and/or during a target sound influence localization accuracy and response latency in a rapid head-pointing task. Human listeners localized brief (150 ms) broadband noise bursts with an average root-mean-square error of 5{degrees} and a baseline latency of 252 ms. Simultaneous visual cues induced the ventriloquism effect, in which the perceived sound location was biased by 1.8{degrees}. Response latency also increased by 21 ms (273 ms). Preceding visual stimuli (2 s duration) did not induce a bias, but increased latency by 55 ms (307 ms). Introducing a 200 ms gap between the preceding light and the sound reduced this latency increase to 24 ms (276 ms), still not inducing a significant bias. When we presented both a preceding and a simultaneous light on opposite sides of the sound, localization reflected the bias induced by the simultaneous light (1.8{degrees}) and the latency increase induced by the preceding light (by 48 ms). These findings reveal a dissociation in audiovisual integration: preceding visual stimuli primarily influence when a sound is responded to (latency), while simultaneous stimuli influence where it is perceived (accuracy). This supports causal inference models of multisensory integration and suggests distinct underlying mechanisms for spatial and temporal processing of sounds in sensorimotor circuits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.5%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.5%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.9%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.4%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
10
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
12
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
22
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%