Back

Predicted Bacterial uRBSs Reveal Translational Coupling and Ribosome Mediated RBS Occlusion as Gene-Controlling Mechanisms

Dietz, T.; Hahnfeld, J. M.; Neumann, S.; Reinsch, Y. A.; Wenz, T.; Barth-Weber, S.; Blom, J.; Goesmann, A.; Evguenieva-Hackenberg, E.

2026-05-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.12.723736 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in the 5' leader of bacterial mRNAs can modulate gene expression, yet genome-wide identification remains limited. We combined bioinformatic prediction of ribosome-binding sites (RBSs) - a Shine-Dalgarno sequence and a start codon - with experimental validation to uncover new uORFs in Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011. From totally 1106 predicted upstream RBSs (uRBSs), we first examined 15 candidates using eGFP reporters and integrating existing RNA-seq and Ribo-seq data. Translation was detected at 13 sites, with fluorescence intensity broadly correlating with predicted initiation rates. Two uRBSs correspond to gene start sites, thereby refining gene annotations. In nine cases, uRBS mutations affected downstream gene expression in reporter fusions. Among others, the data suggests that a Type I secretion system operon, the RNA chaperone gene hfq, and metabolic genes are regulated by uORFs. Four uORFs acted through translational coupling. We also identified uRBSs that were ribosome-occupied yet (nearly) silent in eGFP assays, and closely spaced to the downstream main RBS (mRBS). These uRBSs probably mediate ribosomal occlusion downregulating lacR and SM2011_RS36230. A re-screen of the prediction set revealed 335 close uRBS/mRBS pairs. Three of them were analyzed, supporting the proposed ribosomal occlusion mechanism for SM2011_RS03630 and SM2011_RS22110, while for glnK translational coupling to an uORF was suggested. These results indicate that uORFs are more widespread in bacteria than previously recognized and suggest that direct ribosomal occlusion of the mRBS is a novel mechanism for down-regulating protein synthesis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
26.1%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.8%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
4
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.8%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
21
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
29
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%