Back

The impact of ankle immobility on sprint cycling performance: Implications for para-cycling classification

Boot, R. I.; Kouwijzer, I.; Bobbert, M. F.; de Groot, S.; Kistemaker, D. A.

2026-05-15 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.12.723700 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe para-cycling classification system aims to minimize the impact of impairments on competition outcomes with the help of scientific evidence. This study investigated the impact of unilateral and bilateral ankle immobility on cycling performance, quantified by the maximal average mechanical power output (AMPO) over one revolution relative to that without ankle immobility. MethodsTen well-trained non-disabled cyclists performed all-out 6-second sprints on a cycle ergometer at 120 rpm under three conditions: without ankle foot orthoses (AFOs), with 1 AFO and with 2 AFOs immobilizing the ankle joint(s). Mechanical power output, pedal forces, cycling kinematics and surface-electromyography were measured. Maximal AMPO; ankle, knee and hip joint AMPO; and the amount of muscle excitation were calculated. ResultsWith 1 AFO and 2 AFOs, respectively, maximal AMPO was 96% (p<0.05) and 91% (p<0.001) of that without AFOs (1188 W). The decrease in maximal AMPO with ankle immobilization was less than the decrease in ankle joint AMPO (126 W decrease with 2 AFOs; p<0.001), due to an increase in hip joint AMPO (69 W increase with 2 AFOs; p<0.05). The amount of muscle excitation was not significantly different across conditions. ConclusionsThese findings provide a first quantitative and mechanistic indication of the impact of ankle immobility on cycling performance, which may offer valuable evidence to support the development of an evidence-based para-cycling classification system.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.1%
2
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%