Back

Report on pre-validation of an animal-free alternative method (NAM) for regulatory safety testing: InfiniteLungDT, an in-vitro-learned digital twin for the prediction of material-triggered chronic neutrophilic lung inflammation

Urbancic, I.; Koklic, T.; Kokot, H.; Kokot, B.; Kozoderec, N.; Kolodziej, T.; Licina, T.; Ma-Hock, L.; Hogh Danielsen, P.; Alstrup Jensen, K.; Cubej Gasparin, M.; Pahor, T.; Cosnier, F.; Valentino, S.; Seidel, C.; Isaxon, C.; Vuk, T.; Gate, L.; Landsiedel, R.; Stöger, T.; Vogel, U. B.; Strancar, J.

2026-05-17 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.05.12.723437 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Until now, there has been no animal-free alternative method for predicting chronic inflammation and delivering the associated dose responses, the timing of onset, and the duration of inflammation, as required by regulatory agencies. We present the results of pre-validation of an in-vitro-learned digital twin (InFiniteLungDT) capable of predicting chronic neutrophilic lung inflammation for regulatory use. The method is based on measuring the dynamics of early biological effects in vitro induced by respirable materials or their mixtures, without the need to know their intrinsic properties. We constructed the digital twin(s) for each of the material, for which we have in vivo exposure data. The instillation data set, comprising 49 different nanomaterials, was used as the primary anchor to calibrate the model. Inhalation data set, comprising 7 different nanomaterials, compliant with OECD TG 412, was used to show the general applicability of the method across species and for different exposure scenaria. In total, about 3094 single mouse exposures and 364 rat exposures (and approx. 775/225 non-exposed mouse/rat controls) were used to predict concentration-dependent time-evolved neutrophil influx into the lung. The accuracy (predictive capacity) of LOAEL determination is 93% for instillation and 84% for inhalation exposure. Taking into account the time-to-deliver-result being less than 1 week, this proves that the effect of inhaled material from acute to chronic conditions can be assessed orders of magnitude faster and cheaper than in a reference animal study.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
9
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%