Back

Integrated luminescence and phenotypic profiling for drug discovery in a zebrafish model of Marfan syndrome

Horvat, M.; Caboor, L.; De Rycke, K.; Mennens, L.; Daniels, E.; Wyseur, J.; Verhelst, E.; Roos, I.; Rodriguez-Rovira, I.; Egea, G.; De Backer, J.; Sips, P.

2026-05-13 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.05.12.722859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMarfan syndrome (MFS) is a life-threatening heritable connective tissue disorder caused by pathogenic variants in fibrillin-1, characterized by progressive cardiovascular disease. Current medical therapies slow disease progression but do not prevent major complications, underscoring the need for new treatment strategies and unbiased discovery approaches. MethodsWe used a zebrafish model of MFS lacking fibrillin-3 (fbn3-/-), which recapitulates key cardiovascular phenotypes including cardiac stress, valvular defects, arrhythmia, and aortic dilation. To enable sensitive, quantitative assessment of cardiac stress, we generated a novel transgenic zebrafish reporter expressing secreted nanoluciferase under control of the stress-responsive nppb promoter. This reporter was combined with morphological phenotyping and bulbus arteriosus (BA) imaging. We evaluated standard MFS therapies, targeted modulators of TGF-{beta} signaling, and performed an unbiased high-throughput drug screen of over 1 500 clinically approved compounds across multiple developmental treatment windows. Resultsfbn3-/- larvae exhibited markedly elevated nppb activity that correlated with phenotypic severity and peaked during stages of highest mortality. The nanoluciferase reporter provided a [~]1 000-fold dynamic range, substantially outperforming Firefly luciferase-based assays. Pharmacological inhibition of TGF-{beta} signaling produced transient or deleterious effects, while {beta}-blockers, losartan, and allopurinol failed to consistently improve cardiac stress, pericardial edema, or BA dilation. The unbiased high-throughput drug screen identified a small number of primary and secondary hits; however, none demonstrated reproducible phenotypic rescue upon rigorous multi-dose, multi-time window validation. ConclusionsThis study establishes a sensitive zebrafish-based platform for early, quantitative assessment of cardiovascular stress in MFS. Our findings highlight the limited efficacy of current therapies, the context-dependent nature of TGF-{beta} modulation, and the biological complexity underlying MFS pathogenesis. Although no definitive therapeutic candidates were identified, this work lays a robust foundation for expanded unbiased discovery efforts aimed at identifying disease-modifying interventions for MFS.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
7
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
11
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
15
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
21
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%