Back

Beyond Onset Timing: Longer Sound Envelope Duration Enhances Neural Representation of the Musical Beat

Rosenzweig, F.; Lenoir, C.; Lenc, T.; Polak, R.; Huart, C.; Nozaradan, S.

2026-05-13 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.12.721298 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Musical rhythm is often experienced with a periodic beat, serving as a temporal reference for coordination with the rhythm. Thus far, models of beat processing have mainly relied on representing sensory inputs as patterns of onset timing, with limited consideration of other sensory features. Here, we challenge this view by showing that the internal representation of beat is affected by other temporal features of the stimulus beyond onset timing alone. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while participants listened to rhythmic sequences designed to elicit a beat. Across conditions, we manipulated the duration of the tones conveying the rhythms, while keeping all other parameters identical, including overall intensity, speed, and rhythmic pattern structure. Crucially, the beat periodicity was enhanced in neural activity with increased sound duration, even though the beat periodicity was not prominent in the acoustic features, thus ruling out basic sensory confounds. These results demonstrate the preferential role of longer sound durations in fostering temporal scaffolding processes that integrate fast rhythmic inputs into behavior-relevant internal structures such as the beat. More generally, our findings are compatible with a holistic processing account whereby a range of features beyond onset timing may be integrated into a neural representation of rhythm. Graphical Abstract: Fig. 2EEG was recorded while listeners heard rhythmic sequences eliciting a beat. Sound duration (sonic duty cycle) was varied across four conditions while speed, pattern, and intensity stayed constant. Beat-related EEG responses increased with longer sounds, and were enhanced in all conditions compared to auditory nerve model envelopes, which did not show prominent energy at the beat periodicity, ruling out sensory confounds. Results support holistic rhythm processing beyond onset timing alone. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=101 SRC="FIGDIR/small/721298v1_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10a0599org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f5a95forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@42d1ceorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dc58a7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO EEG and auditory nerve model output analysis based on magnitude spectrum and autocorrelation. Each row represents a duty cycle condition. The two columns on the left represent the magnitude spectrum-based analysis. The first column represents the group-level averaged magnitude spectra at a pool of fronto-central electrodes, across conditions. Beat-related frequencies are shown in red, and beat-unrelated frequencies are shown in blue. Scalp topographies of the neural activity measured at the average magnitudes of beat-related (in red circle) and unrelated (in blue circle) frequencies are represented as insets. The second column represents the normalized magnitude spectra obtained from the auditory nerve model output for each duty cycle sequence. The two columns on the right represent the autocorrelation-based analysis (for visualization purposes, only a subset of lags from 0 to 2.4 s corresponding to the pattern duration is shown). The first column represents the group-level averaged autocorrelation function measured from the same pool of fronto-central electrodes, across conditions. Beat-related lags are shown in red, and beat-unrelated lags are shown in blue. The second column represents the autocorrelation function of the auditory nerve model output for each duty cycle sequence. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
10
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
16
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%