Back

Predicting the When: Multimodal AI for Time-to-Recurrence Analysis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Yin, M.; lai, c.; Yadav, R.; Milstein, J. A.; Thi My Tran, L.; O'Donnell, C.; Schumacher, S.; Cronin, C.; Weinstein, R.; Yamamoto, C.; Ahmad, Z.; Chen, S.; Lefebvre, A.; Ryu, J.; Lacy, A.; Thi Yee, A.; Noh, J.; Kholmovski, E.; Maggioni, M.; Calkins, H.; Spragg, D.; Trayanova, N.

2026-05-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353055 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Catheter ablation is the most effective rhythm control strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, recurrence remains common. Current post-ablation management follows largely population-level protocols, constrained by the absence of tools that can anticipate not merely whether, but when, an individual patient will experience recurrence. The emergence of multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) presents a new opportunity to address this unmet clinical need. Objective: To develop a predictive model for time-to-AF-recurrence post-ablation using pre-procedural bi-atrial imaging, clinical covariates, and procedural characteristics, within a novel multimodal AI and survival analysis framework. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 437 AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with follow-up censored at 36 months. MARTA-AF (Multimodal AI Recurrence and Time-to-event Analysis post-Ablation in AF) was trained on pre-procedural bi-atrial images, and covariates/procedural characteristics, and integrated into a survival model to generate time-varying recurrence probability estimates. Model interpretability was achieved by quantifying contribution of covariates/procedural characteristics to predicted survival probabilities. Results: MARTA-AF successfully predicted time-varying recurrence risk up to three years post-ablation. Patients were effectively stratified into low- and high-risk groups, with statistically significant discrimination sustained over the follow-up period. The model demonstrated consistent performance across clinically relevant subgroups, including sex, age, and AF type. Incorporation of right atrial shape features improved time-to-AF-recurrence prediction. Interpretability analyses identified key recurrence predictors. Conclusions: MARTA-AF delivers individualized, time-varying AF recurrence risk forecasts and enables stratification into clinically meaningful risk groups. This framework has the potential to transform post- ablation management into a proactive paradigm and to support informed clinical decision-making prior to ablation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Nature Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
23
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
25
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%