Back

State Xylazine Scheduling and Changes in Xylazine and Medetomidine Reports in the U.S. Illicit Drug Supply: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Zhu, D. T.; Oh, S.

2026-05-15 health economics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353052 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Xylazine and medetomidine are veterinary sedatives increasingly detected as adulterants in the U.S. illicit drug supply. In response, several states have scheduled xylazine. Whether these policies are associated with subsequent changes in xylazine and medetomidine detections remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a state-level, semiannual, serial cross-sectional study using National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) data from 1999 to 2025. The primary outcomes were xylazine and medetomidine reports per 100,000 NFLIS drug reports. We used staggered difference-in-differences event-study models to estimate changes in report rates after xylazine scheduling. Sensitivity analyses excluded Florida and expanded the treatment definition to include states that criminalized xylazine without formal scheduling. Falsification analyses examined steroid and antidepressant reports as negative-control outcomes. Results: NFLIS recorded 101,987 xylazine reports and 12,085 medetomidine reports. Xylazine scheduling was not associated with a significant change in xylazine report rates (ATT, 2,872.29 per 100,000; 95% CI, -2,024.63 to 7,769.21; p=.250). In contrast, xylazine scheduling was associated with a significant increase in medetomidine report rates (ATT, 1,536.51 per 100,000; 95% CI, 211.14 to 2,861.88; p=.023). Sensitivity analyses produced similar findings. Negative-control outcomes showed no significant changes. Conclusions: State xylazine scheduling was associated with increases in medetomidine reports but no significant change in xylazine reports. These findings suggest that scheduling may be followed by changes in adulterant composition rather than reductions in overall 2-adrenergic agonist involvement. Our study highlights the importance of monitoring the unintended effects of xylazine scheduling and supporting continued investment in public health surveillance, drug checking, and harm reduction services.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
3
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
17
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
26
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%