Maternal Knowledge and Education-Priority Gaps in Preterm Infant Care in the Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abdeljawad, M.; Najim, A.; Abdeljawad, H.; Rodgers, J.; Almukbel, R.; Mokbel, K.
Show abstract
Purpose: To assess maternal knowledge of preterm infant care in Gaza and identify clinically actionable education priorities in a resource-constrained neonatal setting. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 170 mothers of premature infants admitted to neonatal departments in four government hospitals. A 30-item interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed knowledge across thermoregulation, feeding, phototherapy, and infection and skin care. Bivariate analyses, ordinal logistic regression, adjusted predicted probabilities, and exploratory clinical-priority gap analyses were conducted. Results: Overall knowledge was moderate, with a mean score of 64.1% (SD 22.3). Knowledge was classified as poor in 53 mothers (31.2%), good in 41 (24.1%), and excellent in 76 (44.7%). Knowledge differed across domains (p<0.001), with feeding weakest (53.6%) and infection and skin care strongest (73.8%). Not receiving specialist premature-care antenatal follow-up was independently associated with lower odds of higher knowledge (adjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.80, p=0.013). Mothers without specialist follow-up also had a higher adjusted probability of poor knowledge than those who received it (37.4% vs 18.1%) and more clinical-priority gaps (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57, p=0.019). Among the 10 lowest-scoring items, 110 mothers (64.7%) had five or more gaps. Conclusion: Maternal knowledge was uneven, with clinically important gaps in practical care domains. Domain-specific education checklists may strengthen antenatal counselling, bedside teaching, and discharge preparation in similar constrained neonatal settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey 95%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 94%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 94%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 96%
- Breastfeeding outcomes in late preterm infants: a multi-centre prospective cohort study 95%
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rethinking Paediatric Sepsis Care through Local Provider Voices and Lived Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study in Two Hospitals in Ghana 93%
- Reduction in preterm births during the COVID-19 lockdown in Ireland: a natural experiment allowing analysis of data from the prior two decades. 93%
- Indirect Effects of COVID-19 on Maternal, Neonatal, Child, Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Kampala, Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of factors associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study 96%
- Non-invasive detection of bilirubin concentrations during the first week of life in a low-resource setting along the Thailand-Myanmar border 92%
- Spatial distribution and factors associated with low birth weight in Ethiopia using data from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016: spatial and multilevel analysis. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.