Back

Maternal Knowledge and Education-Priority Gaps in Preterm Infant Care in the Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abdeljawad, M.; Najim, A.; Abdeljawad, H.; Rodgers, J.; Almukbel, R.; Mokbel, K.

2026-05-15 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353051 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To assess maternal knowledge of preterm infant care in Gaza and identify clinically actionable education priorities in a resource-constrained neonatal setting. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 170 mothers of premature infants admitted to neonatal departments in four government hospitals. A 30-item interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed knowledge across thermoregulation, feeding, phototherapy, and infection and skin care. Bivariate analyses, ordinal logistic regression, adjusted predicted probabilities, and exploratory clinical-priority gap analyses were conducted. Results: Overall knowledge was moderate, with a mean score of 64.1% (SD 22.3). Knowledge was classified as poor in 53 mothers (31.2%), good in 41 (24.1%), and excellent in 76 (44.7%). Knowledge differed across domains (p<0.001), with feeding weakest (53.6%) and infection and skin care strongest (73.8%). Not receiving specialist premature-care antenatal follow-up was independently associated with lower odds of higher knowledge (adjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.80, p=0.013). Mothers without specialist follow-up also had a higher adjusted probability of poor knowledge than those who received it (37.4% vs 18.1%) and more clinical-priority gaps (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57, p=0.019). Among the 10 lowest-scoring items, 110 mothers (64.7%) had five or more gaps. Conclusion: Maternal knowledge was uneven, with clinically important gaps in practical care domains. Domain-specific education checklists may strengthen antenatal counselling, bedside teaching, and discharge preparation in similar constrained neonatal settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.2%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.8%
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
13
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%