Back

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Risk Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making

Sajal, I. H.; Pfeiffer, R. M.; Jatoi, I.; Gail, M. H.; Cecchini, R. S.; Choudhary, P. K.; Biswas, S.

2026-05-15 surgery
10.64898/2026.05.12.26352924 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Unilateral breast cancer (BC) patients scheduled for mastectomy often choose to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), despite substantial declines in contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk in recent decades. Models predicting absolute risk of future CBC can aid informed decision-making about CPM. CBCRisk is an existing CBC absolute risk prediction model trained on unilateral BC patients regardless of whether they had mastectomy. Here we developed CBCRisk-Mastectomy, tailored specifically to BC patients scheduled for mastectomy and considering CPM. Patients and Methods: We used data on BC patients who underwent mastectomy to treat their first BC from two nationally representative sources: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry. We imputed missing data in the BCSC sample and used conditional logistic regression models, trained on 2,660 BC patients (665 CBC cases) from BCSC, to identify predictors and estimate relative risks (RRs). These were combined with attributable risks and CBC incidence rates estimated from SEER to obtain absolute risk. Cross-validation was used to internally validate CBCRisk-Mastectomy and compare with CBCRisk. Results: CBCRisk-Mastectomy has nine predictors: first BC type, lobular carcinoma in situ status, estrogen receptor status, tumor stage, breast density, age at BC diagnosis, family history of BC, age at first birth, and body mass index. The areas under the curve and their 95% confidence intervals for 5-year predictions for CBCRisk-Mastectomy and CBCRisk were 0.62 (0.59, 0.65) and 0.58 (0.55, 0.61), respectively. Conclusions: CBCRisk-Mastectomy may aid clinicians in counseling BC patients scheduled for mastectomy, enabling improved decision-making regarding CPM.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
23
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%