AI-Based Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-contrast CT: Performance Across Calcium Scoring, Lung Cancer Screening, and Liver Transplant Candidate Cohorts
Ludwig, K. D.; Hatt, C. R.; Keith, L.; Matyga, A. W.; Te, H. S.; Landeras, L.; Chelala, L.; Patel, A. R.; Chung, J. H.
Show abstract
Objective: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment for cardiovascular risk stratification is traditionally achieved using ECG-gated computed tomography (CT). Automated deep-learning (DL) algorithms may streamline opportunistic CAC detection and scoring, particularly on non-gated CT scans. This study evaluated the performance of a fully automated DL-based CAC scoring algorithm ("DL-CAC") against expert human scoring. Methods: The algorithm was trained on 1,260 chest CT scans from multiple databases to automatically identify coronary calcium, calculate Agatston scores, and assign a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk classification. Performance was assessed on a holdout dataset (n=500) comprising ECG-gated calcium scoring CT scans and lung cancer screening non-gated chest CTs as well as in an external, independent CT dataset (n=129) from liver transplant candidates. Agreement with expert scoring was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for Agatston scores and Cohen's {kappa} for CVD risk classification. Results: The algorithm demonstrated high agreement with expert scoring in the pooled calcium scoring and lung cancer screening cohorts, with an ICC of 0.947 for Agatston scores and {kappa} of 0.936 for CVD risk classification. For liver transplant candidates, the algorithm exhibited substantial agreement with expert scoring of non-gated CT scans ({kappa}=0.79) and a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 96.4% in high-risk cases. Conclusion: These findings suggest that DL-based CAC scoring on non-gated CT scans may be a feasible alternative to traditional methods and could support opportunistic cardiovascular risk assessment in routine imaging. Further validation is warranted to assess clinical integration in broader practice settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 95%
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 94%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 93%
- Photon-counting cine-cardiac CT in the mouse 92%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 95%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 92%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 94%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 92%
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.