Back

From static thresholds to dynamic waves: How biological memory destabilizes malaria transmission Potential

Affognon, S. B.; Barreaux, P.; Abelman, S.; Barreaux, A. M. G.

2026-05-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The basic reproduction number R0 is central to malaria epidemiology, yet it is typically treated as a static quantity derived under memoryless assumptions for mosquito demography. In natural systems, however, mosquito populations are shaped by delayed processes such as larval development and density-dependent feedback, introducing biological memory into vector dynamics. We develop a minimal delay-based framework that incorporates this memory into the Ross-Macdonald model by describing adult mosquito abundance with a retarded differential equation. This formulation induces a time-dependent transmission potential R0(t). Using complex analysis and the argument principle, we derive an explicit stability threshold [Formula], which separates stable from oscillatory transmission regimes. Near this threshold, delayed feedback produces slow relaxation times and sustained transient oscillations, implying that transmission potential may vary intrinsically even in the absence of external forcing. To account for ecological variability, we extend this deterministic condition into a probabilistic framework and define the stability probability as [Formula]. Numerical simulations and global sensitivity analysis show that recruitment and developmental delays are the primary drivers of instability, while adult mortality has a weaker stabilizing effect. These results indicate that malaria interventions may influence not only the magnitude of malaria transmission but also its dynamical stability. By linking delay dynamics, transmission theory, and uncertainty quantification, this framework provides a basis for stability-aware modeling and interpretation of malaria transmission under ecological variability. Author summaryMalaria transmission is often summarized by a single number, R0, treated as a fixed indicator of whether transmission will increase or decline. This assumes mosquito populations respond instantly to environmental conditions. In reality, mosquitoes develop through stages where larval conditions, such as crowding, nutrition, or temperature, affect adult populations only after a delay. This creates biological memory: todays mosquitoes reflect past environments. We show that this memory can fundamentally reshape transmission dynamics. When developmental delays are included, transmission potential is no longer constant but can fluctuate over time, even in stable environments. These fluctuations can persist or amplify depending on the balance between mosquito growth, mortality, and delay. As a result, variability in mosquito abundance or malaria transmission may arise from intrinsic dynamics rather than external drivers alone. Under ecological variability, stability becomes probabilistic, allowing estimation of how likely transmission is to remain stable. Interventions that reduce larval productivity or increase adult mortality may therefore both lower transmission and make it more predictable, improving interpretation and control strategies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.7%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.5%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
14
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%