Back

Temperature alters specificity in a host-parasite interaction

Ramirez, A. L.; Gibson, A. K.

2026-05-16 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724370 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Red Queen Hypothesis proposes that genetic variation is maintained in populations through antagonistic coevolution of hosts and parasites. A major assumption of the Red Queen Hypothesis is tight genetic specificity for infection. However, it has been argued that this genetic interaction of host and parasite (GHxGP) is sensitive to environmental context (GHxGPxE). Environmental change could accordingly disrupt coevolutionary oscillations on relevant time scales, calling into question antagonistic coevolution as a general and robust explanation for the maintenance of genetic diversity. To evaluate this critique, we used the plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne arenaria and its natural bacterial parasite Pasteuria penetrans to determine if specificity is altered by temperature. We exposed six isofemale host lines to five parasite sources at three ecologically relevant temperatures. We found that, at two of three temperatures, susceptibility to infection depended on the specific combination of host line and parasite source (GHxGP). This specificity varied across temperatures, consistent with a GHxGPxE effect. This three-way interaction was driven both by quantitative changes in the strength of specificity across temperatures and shifts in the susceptibility rankings of host-parasite combinations. Our study contributes a rare experimental test of a proposed challenge to the Red Queen Hypothesis and suggests the potential for environmental context to change host-parasite specificity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
9
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.1%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
24
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
27
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%