Back

Cephalo-pelvic covariation and sexual dimorphism are disrupted in hybrid mice: implications for the human obstetrical dilemma

Zaffarini, E.; Warren, K.; Vidal-Garcia, M.; Rogers Ackermann, R.; Fischer, B.; Mitteroecker, P.; Hallgrimsson, B.

2026-05-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cephalo-pelvic disproportion in humans has traditionally been interpreted through the obstetrical dilemma framework, assuming a trade-off between bipedal locomotion and childbirth. However, cephalo-pelvic covariation and pelvic sexual dimorphism might be common adaptations to parturition among mammals. We use a controlled hybridization model in mice to test whether cephalo-pelvic covariation and pelvic sexual dimorphism are population-specific, genetically structured, and sensitive to hybridization. We analyzed skull-pelvis variation and covariation, as well as sexual dimorphism of pelvic morphology across four divergent wild-derived mouse strains and their hybrids. Hybridization induced consistent cranial and pelvic size enlargement. Females exhibited significant cephalo-pelvic shape covariation, characterized by an association between rounder, wider birth canals and larger neurocrania, consistent with functional integration under obstetric selection. Hybrids showed disrupted size covariation, increased pelvis shape variance, and reduced cephalo-pelvic integration. Pelvic sexual dimorphism was systematically reduced in hybrids. Cephalo-pelvic covariation and pelvic sexual dimorphism are not exclusive to bipedal or encephalized species. They likely reflect widespread selection on birth canal morphology in mammals and have a complex genetic basis sensitive to hybridization. These findings weaken a human-exclusive interpretation of the obstetrical dilemma and highlight genetic introgression as an understudied factor shaping cephalo-pelvic integration and disproportion risk in mammals, including humans.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.5%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.9%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.9%
7
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.6%
8
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.9%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
14
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
22
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%