Using Deep Learning Models of Gene Regulation to Guide Drug Prioritization
Ovcharenko, I.; Huang, X.
Show abstract
Drug repurposing offers a cost-effective strategy to accelerate therapeutic discovery, but most computational approaches fail to model noncoding genetic variation. Because over 90% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) risk variants reside in noncoding regions, linking regulatory variation to therapeutic hypotheses remains a major challenge. Here, we developed an integrative deep learning framework that links allele-specific enhancer prediction to transcription factor (TF)-centered gene expression changes and drug-induced transcriptional profiles to prioritize candidate therapeutics. Our cell type-specific deep learning enhancer models accurately distinguish active enhancers across seven cell lines. Using breast cancer as a proof-of-concept, we found that GWAS heritability is significantly enriched in MCF7 enhancers, supporting MCF7 as the cellular context for this disease. Allele-specific variant scoring identified breast cancer risk variants with strong allele-dependent effects, and attribution-based motif discovery revealed enrichment of FOXA1-associated motif features, consistent with FOXA1 upregulation in primary tumors. Integration of the FOXA1 knockdown-induced and drug-induced gene expression profiles identified 63 candidate compounds for treatment of breast cancer, including 18 approved drugs, with recovery of the known breast cancer therapy fulvestrant. Among prioritized compounds, 54% showed anti-correlated transcriptional effects across eight core breast cancer pathways, compared to 5.3% of non-prioritized compounds. Integration of drug-gene interaction data further refined these to eight compounds with supporting experimental or clinical evidence. Together, these results establish a regulatory variant-guided drug repurposing framework that connects noncoding genetic variation to therapeutic candidates and provides a generalizable strategy for translating the noncoding genome into pharmacologically relevant hypotheses.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting genetic associations through gene expression patterns highlights disease etiology and drug mechanisms 95%
- The DiffInvex evolutionary model for conditional somatic selection identifies chemotherapy resistance genes in 10,000 cancer genomes 93%
- Community assessment of cancer drug combination screens identifies strategies for synergy prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cis-regulatory mutations associate with transcriptional and post-transcriptional deregulation of the gene regulatory program in cancers 94%
- STAN, a computational framework for inferring spatially informed transcription factor activity across cellular contexts 93%
- Interpretable deep learning for chromatin-informed inference of transcriptional programs driven by somatic alterations across cancers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of between-tissue differences on pan-cancer predictions of drug sensitivity 95%
- Tissue-guided LASSO for prediction of clinical drug response using preclinical samples 93%
- Network models of protein phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination connect metabolic and cell signaling pathways in lung cancer 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.