CatIF-RL: Activity-Oriented Enzyme Sequence Design by Steered Inverse Protein Folding
Li, Y.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, T.; Gong, X.; Wang, F.
Show abstract
Protein inverse folding models are designed to generate amino acid sequences compatible with a given backbone structure, but they are not explicitly optimized for specific biological functions. Here, we present CatIF-RL, a framework that steers a graph-based denoising diffusion inverse folding model toward designing enzyme variants with enhanced catalytic activity. CatIF-RL first adapts the inverse folding model to enzyme structural data, then introduces activity-oriented preference signals using predicted catalytic constant (kcat) as the optimization objective, enabling specialization through generative dataset curation and group-relative policy optimization (GRPO). This process iteratively shifts the sequence distribution toward higher predicted kcat while constraining sequence divergence to sequences that remain compatible with the input structure. On the independent benchmark, CatIF-RL achieves an approximately four-fold increase in predicted kcat relative to native enzymes, substantially outperforming representative inverse folding methods, while maintaining sequence recovery (0.55) and structural fidelity, and supporting motif-preserving partial sequence design. CatIF-RL establishes a practical framework for activity-oriented enzyme design and provides a generalizable strategy for steering structure-conditioned protein generation toward functional optimization.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct prediction of intrinsically disordered protein conformational properties from sequence 95%
- US-align: Universal Structure Alignments of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Macromolecular Complexes 95%
- Predicting structures of large protein assemblies using combinatorial assembly algorithm and AlphaFold2 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.