Engaging working memory following skill reactivation has implications for interlimb skill generalization

Interlimb skill generalization, defined as the transfer of a newly learned skill from the trained to the untrained limb, represents a fundamental aspect of human motor behavior with significant implications for rehabilitation and athletic training. Skill generalization is influenced by processes that drive learning and interact with the newly acquired memory. For instance, in our recent work, we reported that performing a secondary, cognitively demanding task immediately after a short skill-training session impaired skill generalization when the untrained arm was tested 24-hour later. This suggests that working memory (WM) interacts with the early stage of skill memory consolidation processes and thereby impacts skill generalization. Motivated by this finding, in the current study, we investigate how WM interacts with reactivated skill memory and its subsequent impact on skill generalization, tested 24 or 48-hour post skill training. We recruited right-handed young participants (n=95) who performed a fast, accurate reaching task with their dominant right arm during a short training session (50 trials) on Day-1. After 24-hour on Day-2, depending on the group type, participants had a brief skill reactivation session (10 trials or no reactivation) and then performed the WM task (or a control task) with their right arm. Interlimb generalization to the untrained left arm was assessed either immediately after the WM/control task on Day-2 or after a 24-hour gap on Day-3. We found that, engaging in the WM task (compared to the control task) after skill reactivation on Day-2 enhanced immediate generalization. Conversely, when generalization was tested 24-hour later on Day-3, the same WM engagement impaired skill generalization. These findings demonstrate that WM engagement during the post-reactivation phase has a time-dependent influence on interlimb generalization. WM can facilitate immediate generalization, possibly by sustaining neural processes that promote skill memory generalization across effectors. However, when a 24-hour time gap is introduced, generalization is disrupted following WM engagement, possibly because of interference between underlying neural processes involved in WM and reactivation-induced (re)consolidation of the skill memory. This study highlights the delicate interplay among WM, motor memory reactivation dynamics, and skill generalization and suggests a time-dependent interplay of neural processes critical for optimizing outcomes in motor learning and clinical rehabilitation protocols.