Back

Global quantification of mammalian gene expression noise

Welter, A. S.; Mutschler, F.; Simon, M.; Giacomelli, C.; Branscheid, A.-C.; Manukyan, A.; Teixeira Alves, L. G.; Gerwien, M.; Kerridge, R.; Landthaler, M.; Wolf, J.; Selbach, M.

2026-05-14 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724258 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Even cells of the same type growing in the same environment show cell-to-cell differences in protein abundance, a phenomenon known as gene expression noise. This variability can be decomposed into intrinsic components, reflecting molecular randomness, and extrinsic components, arising from differences in cellular state. While gene expression noise has been studied genome-wide in microbes, its global organization remains largely unknown in mammalian cells. Here, we develop a spike-in-based stable isotope single-cell proteomics approach that enables robust quantification of protein-level gene expression noise across thousands of human proteins. We find that protein noise scales inversely with abundance until reaching a plateau, consistent with an extrinsic noise floor and conserved scaling principles observed in bacteria and yeast. Cell cycle stage and cell size contribute substantially to protein variability but do not fully account for the observed heterogeneity. Gene-specific features such as mRNA and protein half-lives and translation efficiency show only weak associations with protein noise, and variability at the mRNA level is a weak predictor of protein variability. Instead, protein noise is largely extrinsic, with coordinated variation across proteins encoding biologically organized cellular states. Consistently, coordinated proteome programs predict intercellular differences in proteome dynamics, linking protein variability to cellular function. Together, these results provide a proteome-wide view of gene expression noise in mammalian cells, establishing that protein-level variability encodes structured and functionally relevant differences in cellular state.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 3%
22.4%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
4
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
10
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
13
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
14
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
19
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%