Back

DeepBioGS: a hybrid framework for integrating crop growth modelling with genomic prediction through neural networks

Jighly, A.; Joukhadar, R.; Trethowan, R.; Daetwyler, H.; Spangenberg, G.

2026-05-21 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724249 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ensuring global food security under rapid climate change demands accelerated genetic gain and breeding strategies that address complex Genotype-by-Environment (GxE) interactions. Traditional genomic selection models often fail to account for novel or extreme climates.Furthermore, integrating mechanistic crop growth models (CGMs) using traditional Bayesian frameworks to solve this issue presents severe computational bottlenecks. Here, we introduce DeepBioGS, a novel hybrid framework that integrates genomic selection with biophysical growth modelling via a fully differentiable deep learning architecture. DeepBioGS utilises a parameter-prediction multi-layer perceptron to map high-dimensional genomic markers to latent, highly heritable physiological traits (Genotype-Specific Parameters; GSP). These parameters mechanistically predict crop phenology across diverse environments. Using two multi-environment wheat datasets comprising over 6,000 genotypes, DeepBioGS extracted latent traits with near-perfect SNP-based heritability values (0.95-1.00). Crucially, the framework demonstrated superior or comparable predictive accuracy (up to r2 = 0.77) against standard genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and traditional Bayesian CGM-WGP models. Its architecture drastically improved computational scalability by enabling standard backpropagation, effectively bypassing the stochastic sampling limitations of approximate Bayesian methods. Most importantly for climate adaptation, DeepBioGS allowed accurate forecasting of genotype performance in entirely unobserved environmental conditions. By merging the representational power of deep learning with the structural constraints of biophysics, DeepBioGS provides a highly scalable, interpretable tool to navigate GxE interactions, enabling the assessment of cultivars under future climate scenarios, thus optimising crop breeding for a changing global environment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 3%
22.6%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
3
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
7
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
30
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%