Back

Channelrhodopsin Ion Selectivity Determines Mechanisms and Efficacy of Optogenetic Defibrillation in Human Atria and Ventricles

Ohnemus, S.; Dasi, A.; Greiner, J.; Wülfers, E. M.; Tillert, L.; Vierock, J.; Quinn, T. A.; Kohl, P.; Boyle, P. M.; Timmermann, V.; Schneider-Warme, F.

2026-05-13 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optogenetic defibrillation uses light-gated ion channels to terminate cardiac arrhythmias through targeted illumination. Previous studies assessed the feasibility of using either cation (e.g. ChR2) or anion (e.g. GtACR1) non-selective channels, both of which depolarise resting cardiomyocytes upon photoactivation. In contrast, recently identified light-gated K+-channels (e.g. WiChR) suppress cardiomyocyte activity while maintaining the membrane potential near its resting state. Here, we use biophysically detailed simulations to compare the defibrillation potential of ChR2, GtACR1, and WiChR. Single-cell simulations show that activation of ChR2 and GtACR1 markedly increase diastolic intracellular Ca2+ concentration (by 42.6% and 52.6%, respectively), whereas WiChR induces only minimal changes (4.0% increase), suggesting a lower pro-arrhythmogenic risk. WiChR activation, however, slightly increases intracellular Na+ levels (by 15.1% compared to 0.1% and 3.4% for ChR2 and GtACR), consistent with the residual Na+ permeability of all currently available K+-selective channelrhodopsins. Simulations of human ventricles and atria demonstrate that GtACR1 most effectively terminates re-entrant arrhythmias at low light intensities, while WiChR achieves comparable efficacy at light levels [≥]5 mW/mm2. Complementary tissue-scale simulations reveal that defibrillation is either based on depolarisation within the excitable gap, followed by fast Na+ channel inactivation (depolarising variants ChR2 and GtACR1), or based on a reduction in membrane resistance supporting arrhythmia termination at sufficiently high light levels (large-conductance ion channels GtACR1 and WiChR). Overall, our findings identify channelrhodopsin ion selectivity as a key determinant of both arrhythmia termination success and mechanisms underlying defibrillation. Key points summaryO_LIWe use computational simulations to compare non-selective cation (ChR2), anion (GtACR1), and K+-selective channelrhodopsins (WiChR) for optogenetic termination of re-entrant arrhythmia. C_LIO_LISingle-cardiomyocyte simulations suggest that ChR2 and GtACR1 activation can cause progressive accumulation of intracellular Ca2+, which is minimised when using WiChR. C_LIO_LISimulations of human left ventricles and atria indicate that GtACR1 is most effective in terminating re-entrant arrhythmia at low light intensities, while WiChR becomes similarly effective at higher intensities. C_LIO_LITissue-scale simulations indicate distinct defibrillation mechanisms: Excitable gap extinction by de-novo action potential initiation followed by inactivation of fast Na+ channels for depolarising channelrhodopsins (ChR2, GtACR1), and reduction in membrane resistance for the large-conductance channels (GtACR1, WiChR), effectively clamping the membrane potential at each channels reversal potential at high light levels. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.1%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
7
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.0%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
18
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
22
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%