Back

Context-dependent tonic signaling shapes the performance and manufacturability of a 4-1BB- based HER2 CAR-T cell therapy

Angelats, L.; Marzal, B.; Rodriguez-Garcia, A.; Espanol-Rego, M.; Lobo-Jarne, T.; Hernandez-Sanchez, M.; Cascallo, G.; Colell, S.; Gimenez-Alejandre, M.; Colell, G.; Castellsague, J.; Andreu-Saumell, I.; Calderon, H.; Galvan, P.; Urbano-Ispizua, A.; Delgado, J.; Gonzalez-Navarro, E. A.; Prat, A.; Juan, M.; Guedan, S.

2026-05-14 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724226 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of clinically effective CAR-T cell therapies for solid tumors requires careful optimization of receptor design, functional fitness, and manufacturability. While advancing low-affinity HER2-targeting CAR-T cells toward clinical application, we found that the candidate with the strongest in vivo antitumor activity--comprising a CD8 hinge and transmembrane region and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain--exhibited measurable tonic signaling. This basal antigen-independent signaling, likely driven by high CAR surface expression, was associated with increased apoptosis and reduced ex vivo expansion under research-grade manufacturing conditions. Modification of the transmembrane domain reduced CAR surface expression but did not alleviate tonic signaling and instead impaired antitumor activity. By contrast, transient pharmacologic inhibition of CAR signaling with dasatinib rescued expansion and reduced apoptosis in small-scale research cultures. Notably, these tonic-signaling-associated defects were largely absent during large-scale, GMP-compliant manufacturing, which enabled robust CAR-T cell expansion without additional benefit from dasatinib supplementation. Together, these findings show that tonic signaling is not inherently detrimental to CAR-T cell performance and that its functional consequences are highly dependent on manufacturing context. Our study underscores the importance of evaluating CAR candidates within clinically relevant production platforms and supports the advancement of this 4-1BB-based HER2-specific CAR-T cell product toward clinical testing.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
4
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
16
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
20
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
21
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%