Back

EMPAC: A Multimodal Dataset for Bridging Affective and Cognitive Empathy

Ota, A.; Kumano, S.; Murata, A.; Nakane, A.; Shimizu, S.

2026-05-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.11.724205 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Empathy, a key element of social interaction, involves both cognitive and affective processes and is commonly investigated through measures such as empathic accuracy and affective physiological synchrony. While physiological synchrony offers a continuous measure of affective processes, empathic accuracy typically relies on discrete self-reports, leaving their temporal relationship largely unexplored. Advancing this line of research requires datasets that integrate time-continuous self-reports with physiological signals, yet such datasets--particularly those focusing on the empathizee--remain limited. To fill this gap, we present EMPAC (Empathy Measurement: Physiological, Affective, and Cognitive), a multimodal dataset constructed. To create empathy-eliciting stimuli, professional actors performed emotionally intense, pseudo-autobiographical narratives while their physiological signals (e.g., ECG, EDA) and continuous self-reported emotional states were recorded. We then conducted two observer experiments using these video recordings. In Experiment 1, to validate the stimuli as empathy-eliciting materials, observers continuously rated emotional intensity without being informed of the specific emotion portrayed, following the protocol of previous studies on time-series empathic accuracy. Yet this approach sometimes revealed a gap between the emotion category portrayed by the target and that perceived by the observers. In Experiment 2, we introduced a revised procedure in which the target emotion category was disclosed prior to viewing, revealing that specifying the target emotion led to a different relationship between individual empathy traits and empathic accuracy than observed in Experiment 1. EMPAC thus provides a rich, temporally aligned resource for investigating empathy dynamics in naturalistic settings and for evaluating methodological variations in empathic accuracy paradigms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.3%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.1%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.6%
9
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
12
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%