Back

Evaluation of fluorescent proteins for compatibility with STED microscopy systems using two-color spectroscopies

Sato, K.; Okada, D.; Sugizaki, A.; Nakagawa, T.; Kumagai, H.; Iketaki, Y.; Terada, S.

2026-05-15 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.11.724171 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is a super-resolution fluorescence imaging technique that achieves high spatial and temporal resolution by exploiting stimulated emission to induce fluorescence depletion (FD) and is expected to have substantial utility for imaging applications using fluorescent proteins. However, the compatibility of fluorescent proteins with STED microscopy systems has been understood primarily through empirical observations, and there is no established methodology for the rational selection of fluorescent proteins for STED microscopy. In this study, we systematically evaluated the compatibility of commonly used fluorescent proteins with STED microscopy systems by measuring FD properties using transient absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence dip spectroscopy, both of which are classified as two-color spectroscopy (TCS). Fluorescent proteins identified as compatible with the STED microscopy system based on the TCS measurements were employed for three-dimensional STED imaging of cellular samples expressing each protein. In all samples, three-dimensional spatial resolution was improved relative to confocal laser microscopy, with particularly marked improvements in z-axis resolution. These findings demonstrate that measurements of FD properties via TCS provide a robust approach for evaluating the compatibility of fluorescent proteins with the STED microscopy system and for selecting suitable fluorescent proteins for STED imaging.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
17
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
18
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%