Back

The effect of cell death on DNA-replication-based estimates of microbial population growth

Hunter, M.; Ghezzi, H.; Jain, A.; He, J.; Tropini, C.

2026-05-12 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.11.723878 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inferring bacterial growth rates is fundamental to understanding microbial interactions and community dynamics, but remains difficult in natural settings where timepoints are limited or organisms are unculturable. In these cases, a widely used method is the origin-to-terminus ratio, or peak-to-trough ratio (PTR), which estimates DNA replication activity by comparing the copy number of DNA at the replication origin and terminus. While PTR correlates well with cellular growth in uniform, idealized environments, it measures replication rather than net growth rate, and thus reflects growth only when there is no cell death. Despite this, PTR is widely applied across a range of laboratory and environmental contexts, where microbial populations frequently experience fluctuating stress, mortality, and subpopulation heterogeneity. Given its widespread use in such settings, we developed a stochastic, cell-based model that explicitly tracks DNA replication and cell death to quantify how different patterns and levels of mortality affect the relationship between PTR and net growth rate. We found that PTR and net growth rate are tightly correlated in idealized conditions; however, systematic deviations emerge when death rates vary over time or across subpopulations. We experimentally validated these predictions by exposing Escherichia coli to osmotic shock or antibiotics, and measuring net growth rate (by spot plating and observing the change in colony counts over time) and DNA replication activity (from qPCR with primers for the origin and terminus). Consistent with the predictions from our model, PTR correlated strongly with net growth rate in standard rich media, but not under stress. Together, these results provide a mechanistic and quantitative framework that clarifies the biological conditions under which PTR can be interpreted as a proxy for net growth rate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
22
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
25
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
27
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%